Intestinal Microbiota at Engraftment Influence Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease via the Treg/Th17 Balance in Allo-HSCT Recipients/Experiment 2

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-7-11

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Graft versus host disease disease, graft-versus-host,disease, graft-VS-host,disease, homologous wasting,disease, runt,diseases, graft-versus-host,diseases, graft-VS-host,graft versus host disease,graft VS host disease,graft VS. host disease,graft-versus-host disease,graft-versus-host disease, resistance to,graft-versus-host disease, susceptibility to,graft-versus-host diseases,graft-versus-host-disease,graft-VS-host disease,graft-VS-host diseases,GVH,GVHD,GVHDS,homologous wasting disease,runt disease,Graft versus host disease
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
standard conditioning
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
intensified conditioning
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
patients diagnoised with grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) undergoing intense conditioning
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
19
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
13

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No

Alpha Diversity

Inverse Simpson Modification of Simpsons index D as 1/D to obtain high values in datasets of high diversity and vice versa
increased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-7-11

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: William Lam

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 5a, b, c, d

Description: Differences in the intestinal microbiota (diversity and composition) are associated with conditioning intensity in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) patients

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in intensified conditioning

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Lachnospiraceae
Oscillospiraceae

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks