Metagenomic analysis reveals oropharyngeal microbiota alterations in patients with COVID-19/Experiment 4

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-7-26

Curated date: 2021/07/14

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1, WikiWorks, Atrayees

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Oropharynx Mesopharynx,Oral part of pharynx,Pars oralis pharyngis,Oropharynx,oropharynx
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
COVID-19 2019 novel coronavirus,2019 novel coronavirus infection,2019-nCoV,2019-nCoV infection,beta-CoV,beta-CoVs,betacoronavirus,coronavirus disease 2019,SARS-coronavirus 2,SARS-CoV-2,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infectious disease,β-coronavirus,β-CoV,β-CoVs,COVID-19,cOVID-19
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy controls
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
COVID-19 patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Confirmed COVID-19 cases
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
28
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
31

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
MGISEQ-2000

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-7-26

Curated date: 2021/07/14

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1

Source: Figure 2a-b

Description: Differential microbial abundance between COVID-19 patients and healthy controls by LefSe

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in COVID-19 patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinobaculum
Bifidobacterium
Bulleidia
Cellulomonas
Corynebacterium
Cryptobacterium
Filifactor
Kytococcus
Lachnoanaerobaculum
Mogibacterium
Parvimonas
Propionibacterium
Schaalia
Selenomonas
Streptococcus
Actinomyces
Rothia
Oribacterium
Xylanimonas
Arachnia
Cardiobacterium
Varibaculum
Mobiluncus

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-7-26

Curated date: 2021/07/14

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1

Source: Figure 2a-b

Description: Differential microbial abundance between COVID-19 patients and healthy controls by LefSe

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in COVID-19 patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Megasphaera
Veillonella
Abiotrophia

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1