Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling/Experiment 1

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-9

Curated date: 2025/04/05

Curator: Ameenatoloko

Revision editor(s): Ameenatoloko

Subjects

Location of subjects
Republic of Korea
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Nucleic acid extraction protocol Nucleic acid extraction protocol,nucleic acid extraction protocol
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
No bead-beating method for TS kit
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Bead-beating method for TS kit
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Bead beating facilitates DNA recovery by lysing both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
1
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
1

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2.0

Alpha Diversity

Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-9

Curated date: 2025/04/07

Curator: Ameenatoloko

Revision editor(s): Ameenatoloko, Montana-D

Source: Supplementary Fig. S7a

Description: Differential microbial abundance between the no-bead-beating and bead-beating groups for the TS kit, as determined by LEfSe analysis.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Bead-beating method for TS kit

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bifidobacteriaceae
Bifidobacteriales
Bifidobacterium
Blautia
Collinsella
Coprococcus
Coriobacteriaceae
Coriobacteriales
Dorea
Eubacteriales
Lachnospiraceae
Lactobacillaceae
Lactobacillales
Lactobacillus
Roseburia
Ruminococcus
Streptococcaceae
Streptococcus

Revision editor(s): Ameenatoloko, Montana-D

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-9

Curated date: 2025/04/08

Curator: Ameenatoloko

Revision editor(s): Ameenatoloko

Source: Supplementary Fig. S7a

Description: Differential microbial abundance between the no-bead-beating and bead-beating groups for the TS kit, as determined by LEfSe analysis.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Bead-beating method for TS kit

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroides
Bacteroidaceae
Parabacteroides
Porphyromonadaceae
Prevotella
Prevotellaceae
Bacteroidales
Faecalibacterium
Oscillospira
Holdemania
Erysipelotrichaceae
Erysipelotrichales
Sutterella
Alcaligenaceae
Burkholderiales

Revision editor(s): Ameenatoloko