The Effect of Psyllium Husk on Intestinal Microbiota in Constipated Patients and Healthy Controls

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-26
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Jalanka J, Major G, Murray K, Singh G, Nowak A, Kurtz C, Silos-Santiago I, Johnston JM, de Vos WM, Spiller R
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
Year
2019
Keywords:
constipation, ispaghula, microbiome, prebiotics, transit
Psyllium is a widely used treatment for constipation. It traps water in the intestine increasing stool water, easing defaecation and altering the colonic environment. We aimed to assess the impact of psyllium on faecal microbiota, whose key role in gut physiology is being increasingly recognised. We performed two randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trials comparing 7 days of psyllium with a placebo (maltodextrin) in 8 healthy volunteers and 16 constipated patients respectively. We measured the patients' gastrointestnal (GI) transit, faecal water content, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) and the stool microbiota composition. While psyllium supplement had a small but significant effect on the microbial composition of healthy adults (increasing Veillonella and decreasing Subdoligranulum), in constipated subjects there were greater effects on the microbial composition (increased Lachnospira, Faecalibacterium, Phascolarctobacterium, Veillonella and Sutterella and decreased uncultured Coriobacteria and Christensenella) and alterations in the levels of acetate and propionate. We found several taxa to be associated with altered GI transit, SCFAs and faecal water content in these patients. Significant increases in three genera known to produce butyrate, Lachnospira, Roseburia and Faecalibacterium, correlated with increased faecal water. In summary, psyllium supplementation increased stool water and this was associated with significant changes in microbiota, most marked in constipated patients.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-25

Curated date: 2025/03/22

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese, Folakunmi

Subjects

Location of subjects
United Kingdom
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Treatment outcome measurement Treatment outcome measurement,treatment outcome measurement
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy participants at Baseline
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy participants following high dose of Psyllium supplementation
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Participants were given 7-14g of Psyllium per day for 7days
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
8
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
8
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
1 Month

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4-V5
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
raw counts
Statistical test
Negative Binomial Regression
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.1
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-24

Curated date: 2025/03/23

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese

Source: Figure 2

Description: Taxonomic differences of fecal microbiota in Healthy Adults

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Healthy participants following high dose of Psyllium supplementation

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Veillonella

Revision editor(s): Ese

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-24

Curated date: 2025/03/23

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese

Source: Figure 2

Description: Taxonomic differences of fecal microbiota in Healthy Adults

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Healthy participants following high dose of Psyllium supplementation

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Subdoligranulum

Revision editor(s): Ese

Experiment 2


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-25

Curated date: 2025/03/23

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Constipated Patients at baseline
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Constipated participants following Psyllium supplementation
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Constipated participants were given 21g of Psyllium per day for 7days
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
16
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
16

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-24

Curated date: 2025/03/23

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese

Source: Table 3

Description: Taxonomic differences of fecal microbiota in constipated participants

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Constipated participants following Psyllium supplementation

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Faecalibacterium
Lachnospira
Phascolarctobacterium
Sutterella
Veillonella

Revision editor(s): Ese

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-24

Curated date: 2025/03/23

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese

Source: Table 3

Description: Taxonomic differences of fecal microbiota in constipated participants

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Constipated participants following Psyllium supplementation

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Christensenella sp.
uncultured Coriobacterium sp.

Revision editor(s): Ese

Experiment 3


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-26

Curated date: 2025/03/25

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese, Folakunmi

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Constipation Constipation,Costiveness,Dyschezia,constipation
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy participants at Baseline
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Constipated participants at Baseline
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Differences in fecal microbiota of Healthy and Constipated participants at Baseline
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
8

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-26

Curated date: 2025/03/25

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese

Source: Table 2

Description: Taxonomic differences of fecal microbiota in Constipated patients and Healthy patients

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Constipated participants at Baseline

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomyces
Adlercreutzia
Christensenella sp.
Clostridia incertae sedis
Desulfovibrio
Erysipelotrichaceae incertae sedis
Rhodococcus
uncultured Coriobacterium sp.

Revision editor(s): Ese

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2025-3-26

Curated date: 2025/03/26

Curator: Ese

Revision editor(s): Ese

Source: Table 2

Description: Taxonomic differences of fecal microbiota in Constipated patients and Healthy patients

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Constipated participants at Baseline

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Lachnospira
SuterellaSuterella

Revision editor(s): Ese