Ocular surface microbiota in patients with aqueous tear-deficient dry eye/Experiment 3

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-1-5

Curated date: 2023/09/04

Curator: Mary Bearkland

Revision editor(s): Mary Bearkland, KateRasheed, WikiWorks

Subjects

Location of subjects
Denmark
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Conjunctival fornix Conjunctiva fornix,Forniceal conjunctiva,Fornix conjunctiva,Conjunctival fornix,conjunctival fornix
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Dry eye syndrome dry eye,Dry Eye Syndrome,dry eye syndrome,Dry Eye Syndromes,dry eye(s),eye(s), dry,KCS,Keraconjunctivitis sicca,Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca,Keratoconjunctivitis sicca,keratoconjunctivitis sicca,Keratoconjunctivitis sicca (disorder),sicca, keratoconjunctivitis,Tear film insufficiency,tear film insufficiency,Dry eye syndrome
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
control
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
ADDE
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Patients with Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye including those with and without Ocular Graft vs Host Disease as diagnosed using the criteria described by the International Chronic Ocular Graft-vs-Host-Disease (GVHD) Consensus. Group and the patients included were classified as either probable or definite chronic GVHD
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
28
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
39
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
3


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-1-5

Curated date: 2023/09/04

Curator: Mary Bearkland

Revision editor(s): Mary Bearkland, WikiWorks

Source: Figure 5

Description: Fig. 5. Bacterial biomarkers identified with the LEfSe algorithm. A. Circular cladogram displaying the relation between taxa at different taxonomic levels (i.e. phylum to genus level). Among the enriched bacteria (biomarkers) in aqueous tear-deficient dry eye (ADDE) (red) was Bacilli and for controls (green) was Pseudomonadaceae. The size of the nodes represents the taxa abundance. B. Scores for linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with LEfSe tool for taxa with LDA score >3 and p <0.05 are shown in the histogram. Similarly, as the cladogram demonstrated, among the bacterial biomarkers, Pseudomonas was identified for controls and Bacilli for ADDE.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in ADDE

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacilli
Bacillota
Brevibacterium
Enhydrobacter
Moraxellaceae
Brevibacteriaceae

Revision editor(s): Mary Bearkland, WikiWorks

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-1-5

Curated date: 2023/09/04

Curator: Mary Bearkland

Revision editor(s): Mary Bearkland, WikiWorks

Source: Figure 5

Description: Fig. 5. Bacterial biomarkers identified with the LEfSe algorithm. A. Circular cladogram displaying the relation between taxa at different taxonomic levels (i.e. phylum to genus level). Among the enriched bacteria (biomarkers) in aqueous tear-deficient dry eye (ADDE) (red) was Bacilli and for controls (green) was Pseudomonadaceae. The size of the nodes represents the taxa abundance. B. Scores for linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with LEfSe tool for taxa with LDA score >3 and p <0.05 are shown in the histogram. Similarly, as the cladogram demonstrated, among the bacterial biomarkers, Pseudomonas was identified for controls and Bacilli for ADDE.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in ADDE

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Carnobacteriaceae
Carnobacterium
Flavobacteriaceae
Pseudomonadaceae
Pseudomonadota
Pseudomonas
Mycobacteriales
Corynebacteriaceae
Micrococcaceae

Revision editor(s): Mary Bearkland, WikiWorks