Microbiome Markers of Pancreatic Cancer Based on Bacteria-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Acquired from Blood Samples: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis

From BugSigDB
Needs review
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI Uniform resource identifier for web resources.
Authors
Kim J.R., Han K., Han Y., Kang N., Shin T.S., Park H.J., Kim H., Kwon W., Lee S., Kim Y.K., Park T., Jang J.Y.
Journal
Biology
Year
2021
Keywords:
early diagnosis, microbial extracellular vesicles, microbiome markers, pancreatic cancer, propensity score matching
Novel biomarkers for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) are necessary to improve prognosis. We aimed to discover candidate biomarkers by identifying compositional differences of microbiome between patients with PC (n = 38) and healthy controls (n = 52), using microbial extracellular vesicles (EVs) acquired from blood samples. Composition analysis was performed using 16S rRNA gene analysis and bacteria-derived EVs. Statistically significant differences in microbial compositions were used to construct PC prediction models after propensity score matching analysis to reduce other possible biases. Between-group differences in microbial compositions were identified at the phylum and genus levels. At the phylum level, three species (Verrucomicrobia, Deferribacteres, and Bacteroidetes) were more abundant and one species (Actinobacteria) was less abundant in PC patients. At the genus level, four species (Stenotrophomonas, Sphingomonas, Propionibacterium, and Corynebacterium) were less abundant and six species (Ruminococcaceae UCG-014, Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group, Akkermansia, Turicibacter, Ruminiclostridium, and Lachnospiraceae UCG-001) were more abundant in PC patients. Using the best combination of these microbiome markers, we constructed a PC prediction model that yielded a high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.966 and 1.000, at the phylum and genus level, respectively). These microbiome markers, which altered microbial compositions, are therefore candidate biomarkers for early diagnosis of PC.

Experiment 1


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/10/20

Curator: Temmie

Revision editor(s): Temmie

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Blood serum Serum,Blood serum,blood serum
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Pancreatic carcinoma cancer of pancreas,cancer of the pancreas,carcinoma of exocrine pancreas,carcinoma of pancreas,carcinoma of the pancreas,exocrine cancer,exocrine pancreas carcinoma,exocrine pancreatic carcinoma,pancreas cancer,pancreas carcinoma,pancreatic cancer,pancreatic cancer (not islets),pancreatic carcinoma,pancreatic carcinoma, familial,Pancreatic carcinoma
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy controls
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Pancreatic cancer patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Patients that have pancreatic cancer
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
52
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
38

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
raw counts
Statistical test
ANCOM
DESeq2
edgeR
metagenomeSeq
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
Confounders controlled for Confounding factors that have been accounted for by stratification or model adjustment
age, sex

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/10/20

Curator: Temmie

Revision editor(s): Temmie

Source: Figure 3

Description: Log2 counts of abundant operational taxonomy units (OTUs) in the Pancreatic Cancer group and the control group.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Pancreatic cancer patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroides
Deferribacterota
Verrucomicrobiota

Revision editor(s): Temmie

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/10/20

Curator: Temmie

Revision editor(s): Temmie

Source: Figure 3

Description: Log2 counts of abundant operational taxonomy units (OTUs) in PC and control group.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Pancreatic cancer patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetota

Revision editor(s): Temmie

Experiment 2


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/10/21

Curator: Temmie

Revision editor(s): Temmie

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/10/21

Curator: Temmie

Revision editor(s): Temmie

Source: Table 2

Description: Microbial composition at the phylum level using nine statistical methods

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Pancreatic cancer patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Pseudomonadota
Spirochaetota
Cyanobacteriota
Planctomycetota
Armatimonadota
Chloroflexota
Acidobacteriota

Revision editor(s): Temmie