Prevention of Loperamide-Induced Constipation in Mice and Alteration of 5-Hydroxytryotamine Signaling by Ligilactobacillus salivarius Li01/Experiment 1

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-6-10

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Anne-mariesharp

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp, Montana-D

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Mus musculus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Intestine secretion Intestinal juice,Intestinal secretion,Succus entericus,Intestine secretion,intestine secretion
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Constipation Constipation,Costiveness,Dyschezia,constipation
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
NC (Normal Control)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
LOP (Loperamide-induced constipation)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Mice that received a daily gavage of 0.4 mL saline buffer for 15 days and 0.2 mL loperamide hydrochloride (10 mg/kg body weight) from the 8th to 15th day to induce constipation.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
6
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
6

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
ANOVA
Kruskall-Wallis
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-6-10

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Anne-mariesharp

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp

Source: Figure 5D

Description: Differentially abundant taxon between the NC (Normal Control) group and LOP (Loperamide-induced constipation) group.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in LOP (Loperamide-induced constipation)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Muribaculaceae

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-6-10

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Anne-mariesharp

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp

Source: Figure 5E

Description: Differentially abundant taxa between the NC (Normal Control) group and LOP (Loperamide-induced constipation) group.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in LOP (Loperamide-induced constipation)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Alistipes
Lachnospiraceae bacterium NK4A136
Ruminococcus

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp