Reducing bias in microbiome research: Comparing methods from sample collection to sequencing

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
Authors
Kool J, Tymchenko L, Shetty SA, Fuentes S
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
Year
2023
Keywords:
16S rRNA gene sequencing, gut, human studies, microbiome, microbiota, reproducible analysis
BACKGROUND: Microbiota profiles are strongly influenced by many technical aspects that impact the ability of researchers to compare results. To investigate and identify potential biases introduced by technical variations, we compared several approaches throughout the entire workflow of a microbiome study, from sample collection to sequencing, using commercially available mock communities (from bacterial strains as well as from DNA) and multiple human fecal samples, including a large set of positive controls created as a random mix of several participant samples. METHODS: Human fecal material was sampled, and aliquots were used to test two commercially available stabilization solutions (OMNIgene·GUT and Zymo Research) in comparison to samples frozen immediately upon collection. In addition, the methodology for DNA extraction, input of DNA, or the number of PCR cycles were analyzed. Furthermore, to investigate the potential batch effects in DNA extraction, sequencing, and barcoding, we included 139 positive controls. RESULTS: Samples preserved in both the stabilization buffers limited the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae when compared to unpreserved samples stored at room temperature (RT). These stabilized samples stored at RT were different from immediately frozen samples, where the relative abundance of Bacteroidota was higher and Actinobacteriota and Firmicutes were lower. As reported previously, the method used for cell disruption was a major contributor to variation in microbiota composition. In addition, a high number of cycles during PCR lead to an increase in contaminants detected in the negative controls. The DNA extraction had a significant impact on the microbial composition, also observed with the use of different Illumina barcodes during library preparation and sequencing, while no batch effect was observed in replicate runs. CONCLUSION: Our study reaffirms the importance of the mechanical cell disruption method and immediate frozen storage as critical aspects in fecal microbiota studies. A comparison of storage conditions revealed that the bias was limited in RT samples preserved in stabilization systems, and these may be a suitable compromise when logistics are challenging due to the size or location of a study. Moreover, to reduce the effect of contaminants in fecal microbiota profiling studies, we suggest the use of ~125 pg input DNA and 25 PCR cycles as optimal parameters during library preparation.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Subjects

Location of subjects
Netherlands
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Sample collection protocol Sample collection protocol,sample collection protocol
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Frozen Zymo control (-80-ZYCON)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Room temperature zymo buffer (RT-ZYBUF)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Zymo buffer at room temperature.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
13
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
13
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
4

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Supplementary Fig 2a

Description: LEfSe analysis showing the significantly distinguishing taxa between the different storage methods based on an LDA score >4.0. Showing the effect of storage at RT, with or without a stabilization buffer In green, compared to the control samples in red.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Room temperature zymo buffer (RT-ZYBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidaceae
Bacteroidales
Bacteroides
Bacteroidia
Bacteroidota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Supplementary Fig 2a

Description: LEfSe analysis showing the significantly distinguishing taxa between the different storage methods based on an LDA score >4.0. Showing the effect of storage at RT, with or without a stabilization buffer in green, compared to the control samples in red.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Room temperature zymo buffer (RT-ZYBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetota
Blautia
Collinsella
Collinsella aerofaciens
Coriobacteriaceae
Coriobacteriales
Coriobacteriia

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 2


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Zymo control at room temperature (RT-ZYCON)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Sample storage at room temperature without buffer
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 Months

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Supplementary Fig 2b

Description: LEfSe analysis showing the significantly distinguishing taxa between the different storage methods based on an LDA score >4.0. Showing the effect of storage at RT, with or without a stabilization buffer in green, compared to the control samples in red.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Zymo control at room temperature (RT-ZYCON)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Enterobacterales
Enterobacteriaceae
Gammaproteobacteria
Pseudomonadota
Escherichia/Shigella sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Supplementary Fig 2b

Description: LEfSe analysis showing the significantly distinguishing taxa between the different storage methods based on an LDA score >4.0. Showing the effect of storage at RT, with or without a stabilization buffer in green, compared to the control samples in red.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Zymo control at room temperature (RT-ZYCON)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Clostridia
Eubacteriales
Lachnospiraceae
Lachnospirales
Staphylococcus
Bacillota
Oscillospiraceae

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 3


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Zymo control at room temperature (RT-ZYCON)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Zymo buffer at room temperature (RT-ZYBUF).
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Zymo buffer at room temperature.

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Supplementary Fig 2c

Description: LEfSe analysis showing the significantly distinguishing taxa between the different storage methods based on an LDA score >4.0. Showing the effect of storage at RT, with or without a stabilization buffer in green, compared to the control samples in red.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Zymo buffer at room temperature (RT-ZYBUF).

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidaceae
Bacteroidales
Bacteroides
Bacteroidia
Bacteroidota
Clostridia
Faecalibacterium
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
Bacillota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Supplementary Fig 2c

Description: LEfSe analysis showing the significantly distinguishing taxa between the different storage methods based on an LDA score >4.0. Showing the effect of storage at RT, with or without a stabilization buffer in green, compared to the control samples in red.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Zymo buffer at room temperature (RT-ZYBUF).

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetota
Collinsella
Collinsella aerofaciens
Coriobacteriaceae
Coriobacteriales
Coriobacteriia
Enterobacterales
Enterobacteriaceae
Escherichia/Shigella sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 4


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Frozen OMNIgene GUT control (-80-OMCON)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Room temperature OMNIgene GUT buffer (RT-OMBUF)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
OMNIgene·GUT tube with a stabilization buffer and stored at RT for 3–5 days before freezing at −80°C
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
65
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
65

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Supplementary Fig 2d

Description: LEfSe analysis showing the significantly distinguishing taxa between the different storage methods based on an LDA score >4.0. Showing the effect of storage at RT, with or without a stabilization buffer in green, compared to the control samples in red.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Room temperature OMNIgene GUT buffer (RT-OMBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidaceae
Bacteroidales
Bacteroides
Bacteroidia
Bacteroidota
Phocaeicola vulgatus

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/04

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Supplementary Fig 2d

Description: LEfSe analysis showing the significantly distinguishing taxa between the different storage methods based on an LDA score >4.0. Showing the effect of storage at RT, with or without a stabilization buffer in green, compared to the control samples in red.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Room temperature OMNIgene GUT buffer (RT-OMBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetota
Bacillota
Bifidobacteriaceae
Bifidobacteriales
Bifidobacterium
Blautia
Clostridia
Coriobacteriales
Coriobacteriia
Lachnospiraceae
Lachnospirales
Acidimicrobiia

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 5


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/11

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Frozen zymo control (-80-ZYCON)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Room temperature zymo buffer (RT-ZYBUF)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Zymo buffer at room temperature.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
13
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
13

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 3B

Description: Boxplots show the relative abundance of the five most abundant phyla. The difference between the storage conditions was tested with the Wilcoxon test.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Room temperature zymo buffer (RT-ZYBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidota
Pseudomonadota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 3B

Description: Boxplots showing the relative abundance of the five top most abundant phyla.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Room temperature zymo buffer (RT-ZYBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 6


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Room temperature zymo control (RT-ZYCON)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Room temperature zymo control

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
Not specified

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Source: Fig 3B

Description: Boxplots show the relative abundance of the five top most abundant phyla.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Room temperature zymo control (RT-ZYCON)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Pseudomonadota
Verrucomicrobiota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 3B

Description: Boxplots show the relative abundance of the five top most abundant phyla.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Room temperature zymo control (RT-ZYCON)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacillota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 7


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Frozen OMNIgene·GUT control (-80-OMCON)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Room temperature OMNIgene·GUTbuffer (RT-OMBUF)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
OMNIgene·GUT tube with a stabilization buffer and stored at RT for 3–5 days before freezing at −80°C
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
65
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
65

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified

Statistical Analysis

LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
3

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/06

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 3B

Description: Bacterial composition at the phylum level, showing the relative abundance of the phyla.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Room temperature OMNIgene·GUTbuffer (RT-OMBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidota
Pseudomonadota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/06

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 3B

Description: Bacterial composition at the phylum level, showing the relative abundance of the phyla.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Room temperature OMNIgene·GUTbuffer (RT-OMBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetota
Bacillota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 8


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Nucleic acid extraction protocol Nucleic acid extraction protocol,nucleic acid extraction protocol
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Mechanical disruption blood kit (MD-BK)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Enzymatical disruption blood kit (ED-BK)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Enzymatical disruption blood kit refers to enzymatical disruption (ED) that was purified with the Maxwell RSC Blood DNA kit (BK).
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
14
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
14

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4

Statistical Analysis

LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
Not specified

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 8A

Description: Boxplots show the relative abundance of the top most abundant phyla. The Wilcoxon test was used to calculate the adjusted p-values of the differences between the DNA extraction methods.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Enzymatical disruption blood kit (ED-BK)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 8A

Description: Boxplots show the relative abundance of the top most abundant phyla. The Wilcoxon test was used to calculate the adjusted p-values of the differences between the DNA extraction methods.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Enzymatical disruption blood kit (ED-BK)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetota
Bacillota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 9


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Mechanical disruption fecal kit (MD-FK)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Enzymatical disruption fecal kit (ED-FK)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Enzymatical disruption fecal kit refers to enzymatical disruption (ED) that was purified with the Maxwell RSC Fecal Microbiome DNA kit (FK).

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 8A

Description: Boxplots show the relative abundance of the top most abundant phyla. The Wilcoxon test was used to calculate the adjusted p-values of the differences between the DNA extraction methods.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Enzymatical disruption fecal kit (ED-FK)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 8A

Description: Boxplots show the relative abundance of the top most abundant phyla. The Wilcoxon test was used to calculate the adjusted p-values of the differences between the DNA extraction methods.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Enzymatical disruption fecal kit (ED-FK)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetota
Bacillota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 10


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Sample collection protocol Sample collection protocol,sample collection protocol
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Frozen zymo control (-80-ZYCON)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Room temperature zymo control (RT-ZYCON)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Room temperature zymo control
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
13
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
13

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Source: Supplementary fig 3A

Description: Boxplots of the relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae in all conditions.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Room temperature zymo control (RT-ZYCON)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Enterobacteriaceae

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Experiment 11


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Room temperature zymo control(RT-ZYCON)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Room temperature zymo buffer (RT-ZYBUF)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Room temperature zymo buffer

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-4-14

Curated date: 2025/04/12

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed

Source: Supplementary fig 3A

Description: Boxplots of the relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae in all storage conditions.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Room temperature zymo buffer (RT-ZYBUF)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Enterobacteriaceae

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, KateRasheed