Oral microbiome dysbiosis among cigarette smokers and smokeless tobacco users compared to non-users

From BugSigDB
Needs review
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI Uniform resource identifier for web resources.
Authors
Chattopadhyay S, Malayil L, Chopyk J, Smyth E, Kulkarni P, Raspanti G, Thomas SB, Sapkota A, Mongodin EF, Sapkota AR
Journal
Scientific reports
Year
2024
Tobacco use significantly influences the oral microbiome. However, less is known about how different tobacco products specifically impact the oral microbiome over time. To address this knowledge gap, we characterized the oral microbiome of cigarette users, smokeless tobacco users, and non-users over 4 months (four time points). Buccal swab and saliva samples (n = 611) were collected from 85 participants. DNA was extracted from all samples and sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiSeq, targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Cigarette and smokeless tobacco users had more diverse oral bacterial communities, including a higher relative abundance of Firmicutes and a lower relative abundance of Proteobacteria, when compared to non-users. Non-users had a higher relative abundance of Actinomyces, Granulicatella, Haemophilus, Neisseria, Oribacterium, Prevotella, Pseudomonas, Rothia, and Veillonella in buccal swab samples, compared to tobacco users. While the most abundant bacterial genera were relatively constant over time, some species demonstrated significant shifts in relative abundance between the first and last time points. In addition, some opportunistic pathogens were detected among tobacco users including Neisseria subflava, Bulleidia moorei and Porphyromonas endodontalis. Overall, our results provide a more holistic understanding of the structure of oral bacterial communities in tobacco users compared to non-users.

Experiment 1


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Buccal epithelium Buccal epithelium,buccal epithelium
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Smoking behaviour measurement Smoking behaviour measurement,smoking behaviour measurement
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Cigarettes users (CG ) + Smokeless tobacco users (ST)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Non-tobacco users (NU)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users had never used tobacco products in their lifetime.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
42
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
43
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 Months.

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Kruskall-Wallis
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, race, sex

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 4, S8 and S9

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by user group: cigarette user (CG, orange), smokeless tobacco user (ST, green), and non-user (NU). (*) represents p-value < 0.05.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidota
Pseudomonadota
Actinomycetota
Fusobacteriota
Granulicatella
Actinomyces
Prevotella
Oribacterium

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 4, S8 and S9

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by user group: cigarette user (CG, orange), smokeless tobacco user (ST, green), and non-user (NU). (*) represents p-value < 0.05.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacillota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 2


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Cigarettes users (CG )
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users had never used tobacco products.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
24
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 Months

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
race, sex, age

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 4.

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by user group: cigarette user (CG, orange), smokeless tobacco user (ST, green), and non-user (NU). (*) represents p-value < 0.05.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Neisseria
Veillonella

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 3


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco users (ST)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had used tobacco at least once per week for the previous whole year.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
18

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, race, sex

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 4

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by user group: cigarette user (CG, orange), smokeless tobacco user (ST, green), and non-user (NU). (*) represents p-value < 0.05.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Pseudomonas

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: fig 4

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by user group: cigarette user (CG, orange), smokeless tobacco user (ST, green), and non-user (NU). (*) represents p-value < 0.05.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Leptotrichia

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 4


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Non-tobacco users (NU)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had never used tobacco product in their life time.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
43

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 5A

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in buccal swab samples that were statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Abiotrophia
Streptococcus anginosus
Actinomyces

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 5A

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in buccal swab samples that were statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Aggregatibacter
Leptotrichiaceae

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 5


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Non-tobacco users (NU)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Cigarette users (CG)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users had smoked more than six cigarettes on a typical day for the previous 3 years.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
43
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
24

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 5A

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in buccal swab samples that were statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Cigarette users (CG)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Peptostreptococcaceae bacterium
uncultured Anaerovorax sp.
uncultured Rhodococcus sp.
Solobacterium moorei
Streptococcus infantis

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 5A

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in buccal swab samples that were statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Cigarette users (CG)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Ochrobactrum sp.
uncultured Leptotrichia sp.
uncultured Neisseria sp.
uncultured Aggregatibacter sp.
uncultured Haemophilus sp.
Neisseria subflava
uncultured Pseudomonas sp.
uncultured Prevotella sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 6


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco user (ST).
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Non-tobacco users (NU)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had never used a tobacco product in their lifetime.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
18
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
43

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 5B

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in buccal swab samples that were statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Streptococcus sp.
uncultured Actinomyces sp.
uncultured Mogibacteriaceaeuncultured Mogibacteriaceae
uncultured Oribacterium sp.
uncultured Peptostreptococcus sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 5B

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in buccal swab samples that were statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Neisseria sp.
uncultured Achromobacter sp.
Neisseria subflava
Haemophilus parainfluenzae

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 7


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Non-tobacco users (NU)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco users (ST)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had used tobacco at least once a week for the previous whole year.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
43
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
18

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 5B

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in buccal swab samples that were statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Coprococcus sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 8


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Saliva Sailva normalis,Saliva atomaris,Saliva molecularis,Salivary gland secretion,Saliva,saliva
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Cigarette users (CG)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had smoked more than six cigarettes on a typical day for the previous 3 years.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
24

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 6A

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that was statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Cigarette users (CG)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Corynebacterium sp.
uncultured Propionibacterium sp.
uncultured Anaerovorax sp.
uncultured Peptostreptococcales bacterium
uncultured Streptococcus sp.
uncultured Actinomyces sp.
Veillonella parvula
Rothia aeria
uncultured Granulicatella sp.
uncultured Lachnospiraceae bacterium
Streptococcus infantis
Rothia mucilaginosa
Veillonella dispar
uncultured Oribacterium sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 6B

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that was statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Cigarette users (CG)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Haemophilus parainfluenzae
uncultured Capnocytophaga sp.
uncultured Pasteurellaceae bacterium
uncultured Lautropia sp.
Neisseria subflava
uncultured Prevotella sp.
uncultured Porphyromonas sp.
uncultured Vibrionaceae bacterium
Prevotella melaninogenica
uncultured Leptotrichia sp.
uncultured Neisseriaceae bacterium
Haemophilus parahaemolyticus
uncultured Fusobacterium sp.
uncultured Ochrobactrum sp.
uncultured Weeksellaceae bacterium
uncultured Pseudomonas sp.
uncultured Aggregatibacter sp.
uncultured Rhizobiales bacterium HF4000_32B18
uncultured Haemophilus sp.
uncultured Neisseria sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 9


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Cigarettes users (CG )
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Non-tobacco users (NU)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had never used a tobacco product in their lifetime.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
24
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
43

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 6A

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that was statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Streptococcus anginosus
uncultured Actinomyces sp.
uncultured Slackia sp.
uncultured Dialister sp.
uncultured Coriobacteriaceae bacterium
uncultured Parvimonas sp.
uncultured Megasphaera sp.
Limosilactobacillus reuteri
uncultured Filifactor sp.
uncultured Acidaminobacteraceaeuncultured Acidaminobacteraceae
uncultured Lactobacillus sp.
uncultured Sharpea sp.
uncultured Bulleidia sp.
uncultured Clostridialesuncultured Clostridiales
uncultured Scardovia sp.
uncultured Mogibacteriaceaeuncultured Mogibacteriaceae
uncultured Catonella sp.
Ligilactobacillus salivarius
uncultured Bifidobacterium sp.
uncultured Veillonella sp.
uncultured pseudoramibacter-Eubacteriumuncultured pseudoramibacter-Eubacterium

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 6A

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that was statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Leptotrichiaceae bacterium
uncultured Leptotrichia sp.
uncultured Prevotella sp.
uncultured Porphyromonas sp.
Treponema amylovorum
Treponema socranskii
uncultured Enhydrobacter sp.
Porphyromonas endodontalis
Prevotella nigrescens
Prevotella melaninogenica

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 10


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco user (ST).
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
18

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig 6B

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that was statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Corynebacterium sp.
uncultured Actinomyces sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 6B

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that was statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Prevotella sp.
uncultured Neisseria sp.
Escherichia coli

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 11


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Non-tobacco users (NU)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco users (ST)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had used tobacco at least once a week for the previous whole year.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
43
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
18

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 6B

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that was statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Streptococcaceae bacterium
uncultured Streptococcus sp.

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 6B

Description: Relative abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that was statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between (a) non-users (NU) and cigarette users (CG) and (b) non-users (NU) and smokeless tobacco users (ST).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
uncultured Leptotrichia sp.
Treponema amylovorum
Porphyromonas endodontalis

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 12


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Cigarettes users (CG )
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Non-tobacco users (NU)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had never used a tobacco product in their lifetime.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
24
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
43

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 4, S8 and S9

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by user group: cigarette user (CG, orange), smokeless tobacco user (ST, green), and non-user (NU). (*) represents p-value < 0.05.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Non-tobacco users (NU)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Fusobacterium
Haemophilus
Pseudomonas
Rothia
Actinomycetota
Pseudomonadota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Experiment 13


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco users (ST)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Users who had used tobacco at least once a week for the previous whole year.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
18

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 4, S8 and S9

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by user group: cigarette user (CG, orange), smokeless tobacco user (ST, green), and non-user (NU). (*) represents p-value < 0.05.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Pseudomonadota
Fusobacterium
Granulicatella
Neisseria
Leptotrichia
Oribacterium
Porphyromonas
Rothia
Haemophilus

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite

Source: Fig. 4, S8 and S9

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by user group: cigarette user (CG, orange), smokeless tobacco user (ST, green), and non-user (NU). (*) represents p-value < 0.05.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Lactobacillus
Actinomyces
Veillonella
Prevotella
Bacteroidia
Bacillota
Actinomycetota

Revision editor(s): Shulamite