Fermented foods affect the seasonal stability of gut bacteria in an Indian rural population

From BugSigDB
Needs review
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Jeyaram K, Lahti L, Tims S, Heilig HGHJ, van Gelder AH, de Vos WM, Smidt H, Zoetendal EG
Journal
Nature communications
Year
2025
The effect of fermented foods on healthy human gut microbiota structure and function, particularly its seasonal preference and frequent long-term consumption, has been largely uncharacterised. Here, we assess the gut microbiota and metabolite composition of 78 healthy Indian agrarian individuals who differ in the intake of fermented milk and soybean products by seasonal sampling during hot-humid summer, autumn and dry winter. Here we show that, seasonal shifts between the Prevotella- and Bifidobacterium/Ruminococcus-driven community types, or ecological states, and associated fatty acid derivatives, with a bimodal change in Bacteroidota community structure during summer, particularly in fermented milk consumers. Our results associate long-term fermented food consumption with reduced gut microbiota diversity and bacterial load. We identify taxonomic groups that drive the seasonal fluctuation and associated shifts between the two ecological states in gut microbiota. This understanding may pave the way towards developing strategies to sustain a healthy and resilient gut microbiota through dietary interventions.

Experiment 1


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/07

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie, WikiWorks

Subjects

Location of subjects
India
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Phenotype Phenotype,phenotype
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
European Individuals
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Indian Individuals
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
This group of individuals represents a traditional Indian agrarian population, which exhibits a Prevotella-driven gut microbiota who are long-term consumers of fermented foods.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
78
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
78
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, body mass index, sex
Confounders controlled for Confounding factors that have been accounted for by stratification or model adjustment
age, body mass index, sex

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/17

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Source: Fig. 3B

Description: The overall relative abundance distributions of Prevotella melaninogenica.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Indian Individuals

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Prevotella melaninogenica

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/17

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Source: Fig. 3B

Description: The overall relative abundance and distributions of Bifidobacterium

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Indian Individuals

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bifidobacterium

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Experiment 2


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/10

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Joiejoie

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Group A ( never consumed Hawaijar and Dahi )
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Groups B (consumed both Hawaijar and Dahi), C (consumed Hawaijar, not Dahi), and D (consumed Dahi, not Hawaijar)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
This group consists of Individuals with a long-term dietary habit of consuming fermented foods (Dahi and/or Hawaijar) for at least 10 years, with a minimum frequency of 3 times per week.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
20
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
58

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/17

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Source: Fig. 7A

Description: Diet alters the taxa's relative abundance on average with respect to the control diet (Group-A).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Groups B (consumed both Hawaijar and Dahi), C (consumed Hawaijar, not Dahi), and D (consumed Dahi, not Hawaijar)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Catenibacterium mitsuokai
Parabacteroides distasonis
Tannerella
Odoribacter splanchnicus

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/17

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Source: Fig. 7A

Description: Diet alters the taxa's relative abundance on average with respect to the control diet (Group-A).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Groups B (consumed both Hawaijar and Dahi), C (consumed Hawaijar, not Dahi), and D (consumed Dahi, not Hawaijar)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Alloprevotella tannerae

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Experiment 3


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/10

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Group A (never consumed Hawaijar and Dahi)

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/10

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie, WikiWorks

Source: Fig. 7B

Description: Gut bacteria with significant seasonal effects on their relative abundance, compared to autumn, after controlling for diet and subject effects.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Groups B (consumed both Hawaijar and Dahi), C (consumed Hawaijar, not Dahi), and D (consumed Dahi, not Hawaijar)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Aerococcus
Alistipes
Alloprevotella tannerae
Anaerofustis
Bacteroides intestinalis
Bacteroides ovatus
Bacteroides stercoris
Bacteroides uniformis
Eggerthella lenta
Granulicatella
Hoylesella oralis
Lactobacillus gasseri
Odoribacter splanchnicus
Parabacteroides distasonis
Phocaeicola plebeius
Phocaeicola vulgatus
Serratia
Streptococcus equinus
Sutterella wadsworthensis
Tannerella
Weissella
Xylanibacter ruminicola
uncultured Bacteroidota bacterium

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie, WikiWorks

Experiment 4


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/10

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
European Subjects
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Indian Subjects
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
This group consists of Indian agrarian individuals who differed in their intake of fermented milk and soybean products, with seasonal sampling during hot-humid summer, autumn, and dry winter.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
76
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
76

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/10

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie, WikiWorks

Source: Fig. S3

Description: The abundance distribution of gut microbiota taxa significantly differing between Indian and European subjects

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Indian Subjects

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Ligilactobacillus salivarius
Megamonas hypermegale
Megasphaera elsdenii
Veillonella

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie, WikiWorks

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/19

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Source: Fig. S3

Description: The abundance distribution of gut microbiota taxa significantly differing between Indian and European subjects

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Indian Subjects

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaerostipes caccae
Thermoclostridium stercorarium
Anaerobutyricum hallii

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Experiment 5


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/11

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Group-A (not consumed Dahi and Hawaijar)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Group-B ( consumed Dahi and Hawaijar), Group-C ( consumed Hawaijar not Dahi), and Group-D ( consumed Dahi not Hawaijar).
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
This group includes Individuals in Groups B, C, and D who consumed fermented foods, with Group-B consuming both Dahi and Hawaijar, Group-C consuming only Hawaijar, and Group-D consuming only Dahi.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
58
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
156

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
ANOVA


Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/19

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Source: Fig. S7A

Description: Long-term fermented food consumption affects Bacillus load in fecal samples across different diet groups.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Group-B ( consumed Dahi and Hawaijar), Group-C ( consumed Hawaijar not Dahi), and Group-D ( consumed Dahi not Hawaijar).

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacillus

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Experiment 6


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/12

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Joiejoie

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Cluster-B/R
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Cluster-P
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
This group includes a Prevotella-driven gut microbiota cluster characterized by a significantly higher abundance of Prevotella melaninogenica, Prevotella tannerae, Prevotella oralis and Prevotella ruminicola.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
97
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
117

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)


Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/19

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Source: Table S2

Description: The absolute abundance of gut bacterial taxa distinguishing Cluster-P (Prevotella-driven) and Cluster-B/R (Bifidobacterium/Ruminococcus-driven).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Cluster-P

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Prevotella melaninogenica
Alloprevotella tannerae
Hoylesella oralis
Xylanibacter ruminicola

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/19

Curator: Joiejoie

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie

Source: Table S2

Description: The absolute abundance of gut bacterial taxa distinguishing Cluster-P (Prevotella-driven) and Cluster-B/R (Bifidobacterium/Ruminococcus-driven).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Cluster-P

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaerostipes caccae
Marvinbryantia formatexigens
Ginkgoales
Blautia obeum
[Clostridium] symbiosum

Revision editor(s): Joiejoie