The difference of oropharyngeal microbiome during acute respiratory viral infections in infants and children
-
Quality control
- Retracted paper
- Contamination issues suspected
- Batch effect issues suspected
- Uncontrolled confounding suspected
- Results are suspect (various reasons)
- Tags applied
Experiment 1
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- China
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Oropharynx Mesopharynx,Oral part of pharynx,Pars oralis pharyngis,Oropharynx,oropharynx
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Respiratory tract infectious disease infection, respiratory tract,infections, respiratory,infections, respiratory tract,infections, upper respiratory,infections, upper respiratory tract,respiratory infection, upper,respiratory infections,respiratory tract infection,upper respiratory infections,upper respiratory tract infections,Respiratory tract infectious disease,respiratory tract infectious disease
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Inpatients
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Outpatients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Children with Acute respiratory infections (ARI) who visited the hospital but did not require hospitalization.
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 49
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 60
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- WMS
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- Not specified
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- LEfSe
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- No
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- 2
- Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
- age, sex
Alpha Diversity
- Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
- unchanged
- Richness Number of species
- unchanged
Signature 1
Source: Fig. 2F and G
Description: LDA score and relative abundance of 15 significantly different taxa calculated by LEfSe analysis.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Outpatients
Revision editor(s): Shulamite
Experiment 2
Subjects
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Children with ARI who visited the hospital but did not require hospitalization.
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
- Statistical test
- Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- Yes
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- Not specified
Alpha Diversity
- Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
- unchanged
- Richness Number of species
- unchanged
Signature 1
Source: Table S3
Description: Two-fold changes of microbial abundances between inpatients and outpatients.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Outpatients
Revision editor(s): Shulamite
Experiment 3
Curated date: 2025/05/04
Curator: Shulamite
Revision editor(s): Shulamite, Anne-mariesharp, KateRasheed
Subjects
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Fatigue Fatigue,Tired,Tiredness,fatigue
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Non-fatigue
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Fatigue
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Children who exhibited fatigue as part of their clinical presentation of ARI.
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- Not specified
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- Not specified
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
- Statistical test
- LEfSe
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- 2
Alpha Diversity
- Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
- decreased
- Richness Number of species
- unchanged
Signature 1
Source: Table S4
Description: Differences of taxonomic relative abundance between disease-related symptom groups by LEfSe analysis.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Fatigue
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Moraxella catarrhalis | ||
Porphyromonas catoniae | ||
GGB12794GGB12794 | ||
GGB12794_SGB19881GGB12794_SGB19881 | ||
Lactococcus | ||
Lactococcus lactis |
Revision editor(s): Shulamite, Anne-mariesharp