The microbiome is associated with obesity-related metabolome signature in the process of aging

From BugSigDB
Needs review
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI Uniform resource identifier for web resources.
Authors
Binyamin D., Turjeman S., Asulin N., Schweitzer R., Koren O.
Journal
NPJ biofilms and microbiomes
Year
2025
Aging involves changes in the gut microbiome impacting health and longevity; however, the roles of specific microbial metabolites remain understudied. Here, we examine the microbial contribution to the metabolic profile in aged mice. Fecal samples were collected from female Swiss-Webster mice raised conventionally (Conv) or germ free (GF), at 8 weeks (young) and 18 (aged) months of age, and the microbiome and metabolome were characterized. Significant differences were observed in bacterial composition and its predicted functional activity between young and aged mice. Interestingly, we found more age-related differences in metabolite abundances among Conv mice than GF mice, highlighting the contribution of the microbiome to aging. Moreover, microbiome-associated metabolites, predominantly lipids, were higher in aged mice, with linoleic acid metabolism enriched in this group. Our study underscores a microbiome-dependent component to age-related metabolic changes in mice, particularly in lipid-associated pathways, and contributes to the growing body of literature linking gut microbiota to host metabolism in aging.

Experiment 1


incomplete

Curated date: 2025/10/17

Curator: Jesulolufemi

Revision editor(s): Jesulolufemi

Subjects

Location of subjects
Israel
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Mus musculus


Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Young mice (8 weeks old)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Aged mice (18 months old)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Stool microbiome composition of aged (18 months) conventional mice compared with young (8 weeks) conventional mice
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
30
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
30

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
ANCOM-BC
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.001
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Faith Phylogenetic diversity, takes into account phylogenetic distance of all taxa identified in a sample
increased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/10/17

Curator: Jesulolufemi

Revision editor(s): Jesulolufemi

Source: Figure 2D/ Supplementary Table 2

Description:

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Aged mice (18 months old)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bifidobacterium
Bilophila
Butyricicoccus
Clostridium
Coprococcus
Lactobacillus
Oscillospira
Roseburia
Turicibacter
unclassified Lachnospiraceae
unclassified Peptococcaceae
Unclassified RF39Unclassified RF39
Unclassified ClostridialesUnclassified Clostridiales
Unclassified RuminococcaceaeUnclassified Ruminococcaceae
Clostridium 1Clostridium 1

Revision editor(s): Jesulolufemi

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/10/17

Curator: Jesulolufemi

Revision editor(s): Jesulolufemi

Source: Figure 2D/ Supplementary Table 2

Description:

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Aged mice (18 months old)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Parabacteroides
Akkermansia
Prevotella
unclassified Rikenellaceae
Alistipes
unclassified Bacteroidales
Odoribacter
unclassified Bacteria
Unclassified S24-7Unclassified S24-7

Revision editor(s): Jesulolufemi

Experiment 2


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/10/17

Curator: Jesulolufemi

Revision editor(s): Jesulolufemi

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Microbiome Microbiome,microbiome
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Germ-free (GF, aged)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Conventional (Conv, aged)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Aged mice with normal microbiota compared to germ-free aged mice
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
4
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
4

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased