Analysis of the cervical microbiome and potential biomarkers from postpartum HIV-positive women displaying cervical intraepithelial lesions/Experiment 1

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Davvve, ChiomaBlessing

Subjects

Location of subjects
Brazil
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Uterus Uterus,uterus
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia Cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia,cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Normal tissue HIV patients
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Cervical Intraepithelial Lesion HIV patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Cases were identified by HIV rapid or ELISA test and subsequent Western blot following recommendations for HIV diagnosis by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. this were also patients with cervical intraepithelial lesions
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
42
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
38

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V6
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Phyu Han

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3

Description: Bacteria that presented higher relative abundance in cervical lesions using LEfse

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Cervical Intraepithelial Lesion HIV patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Moryella

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks