Alterations in the intestinal microbiome and mental health status of workers in an underground tunnel environment/Experiment 1
From BugSigDB
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- China
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Gut microbiome measurement Gut microbiome measurement,gut microbiome measurement
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Workers before entry into an underground tunnel (Baseline status (BS))
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Workers after entry into an underground tunnel (Exposed status (ES))
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Tunnel workers who spent 3 (three) weeks working in the underground tunnel.
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 48
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 48
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V4-V5
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- LEfSe
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- No
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- 3.5
Alpha Diversity
- Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
- decreased
- Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
- unchanged
- Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
- decreased
- Richness Number of species
- unchanged
Signature 1
Source: Figure 3A, Text (page 3)
Description: LEfSe and LDA analysis revealed changes in the taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota in ES (Exposed status) compared to BS (Baseline status) tunnel workers.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Workers after entry into an underground tunnel (Exposed status (ES))
Revision editor(s): Flo
Signature 2
Source: Figure 3A, Text (page 3)
Description: LEfSe and LDA analysis revealed changes in the taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota in ES (Exposed status) compared to BS (Baseline status) tunnel workers.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Workers after entry into an underground tunnel (Exposed status (ES))
| NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
|---|---|---|
| Faecalibacterium | ||
| Roseburia |
Revision editor(s): Flo
