Profiling the urinary microbiome in men with calcium-based kidney stones/Experiment 2

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2024/03/21

Curator: Victoria

Revision editor(s): Victoria

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Renal pelvis/ureter Renal pelvis and ureter,Renal pelvis plus ureter,Renal pelvis/ureter,renal pelvis/ureter
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Nephrolithiasis Calculi, Kidney,Calculi, Renal,calculus of kidney and ureter,Calculus, Kidney,Calculus, Renal,CAON,Kidney Calculi,Kidney Calculus,kidney stone,Kidney Stones,Kidney stones,kidney stones,nephrolithiasis,nephrolithiasis, calcium oxalate,Renal Calculi,Renal calculi,renal calculi,Renal Calculus,Renal stones,Stone - kidney/ureter,Stone, Kidney,Stones, Kidney,urolithiasis, calcium oxalate,Nephrolithiasis
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
KB group - Bladder urine from kidney stone patients.
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
KP group - Renal pelvis urine from kidney stone patients.
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Renal pelvis urine collected from nephrolithiasis (Kidney stone) patients.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
22
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
22
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
Participants using antibiotics within 30days were excluded.

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age


Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/03/22

Curator: Victoria

Revision editor(s): Victoria

Source: Fig. 5A & 5B

Description: A Cladogram and LEfSe analyses of microbiomes among HB (red), KB (green) and KP (blue) groups. Taxa in graph were with LDA score threshold > 2.0 and statistically significant (p < 0.05)

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in KP group - Renal pelvis urine from kidney stone patients.

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Fusobacteriaceae
Fusobacterium
Pseudomonadota
Gammaproteobacteria
Moraxellaceae
Acinetobacter
Pseudomonadales

Revision editor(s): Victoria

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/03/22

Curator: Victoria

Revision editor(s): Victoria

Source: Fig. 5A & 5B

Description: A Cladogram and LEfSe analyses of microbiomes among HB (red), KB (green) and KP (blue) groups. Taxa in graph were with LDA score threshold > 2.0 and statistically significant (p < 0.05)

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in KP group - Renal pelvis urine from kidney stone patients.

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomycetales
Anoxybacillus

Revision editor(s): Victoria