Comparison of Co-housing and Littermate Methods for Microbiota Standardization in Mouse Models/Experiment 11

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2024/04/15

Curator: Aleru Divine

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Subjects

Location of subjects
Canada
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Mus musculus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces , Colon Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces,Hindgut,Large bowel,Posterior intestine,Colon,colon
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Gut microbiome measurement Gut microbiome measurement,gut microbiome measurement
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
TAC-CH colon group
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
TAC-CH fecal pellets group
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Samples taken from the fecal pellets of co-housed mice from Taconic Farms (TAC-CH).
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
16
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
16
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
None

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2.0
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age


Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/04/15

Curator: Aleru Divine

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Source: Figure S3

Description: LEfSe plots comparing differentiating taxa (family/ genus) in colon and pellet compartments of co-housed mice from Taconic Farms (TAC-CH).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in TAC-CH fecal pellets group

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Adlercreutzia
Akkermansia
Bacteroides
Bifidobacterium
Clostridiaceae
Erysipelotrichaceae
Lactobacillus
Muribaculaceae
Parabacteroides
Rickettsiales
RF39RF39

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/04/15

Curator: Aleru Divine

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Source: Figure S3

Description: LEfSe plots comparing differentiating taxa (family/ genus) in colon and pellet compartments of co-housed mice from Taconic Farms (TAC-CH).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in TAC-CH fecal pellets group

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Eubacteriales
Mucispirillum
Anaeroplasma
Oscillospiraceae
Oscillospira
Ruminococcus
Ruminococcus sp.
Coprococcus

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine