Comparison of Co-housing and Littermate Methods for Microbiota Standardization in Mouse Models/Experiment 18

EditHistoryDelete

Mark reviewed

Your review change was submittedDuplicate this ExperimentAdd a new Signature

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/04/15

Curator: Aleru Divine

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Subjects

Location of subjects

Canada

Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.

Mus musculus

Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology

Colon Hindgut,Large bowel,Posterior intestine,Colon,colon

Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology

Gut microbiome measurement Gut microbiome measurement,gut microbiome measurement

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies

P1 TAC group

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies

F1 mTAC group

Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group

Colon samples from the maternal F1-generation of Taconic farms (mTAC) mice.

Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group

4

Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group

15

Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)

None

Lab analysis

Sequencing type

16S

16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene

V4

Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance

Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).

relative abundances

Statistical test

Dunn's test

Kruskall-Wallis

Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)

0.05

MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?

Yes

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness

unchanged

Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness

increased

Richness Number of species

increased