Comparative characterization of the infant gut microbiome and their maternal lineage by a multi-omics approach/Experiment 7

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-9-24

Curated date: 2024/09/23

Curator: Aleru Divine

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Subjects

Location of subjects
Spain
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Gut microbiome measurement Gut microbiome measurement,gut microbiome measurement
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Infants and Mothers
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Grandmothers
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Grandmothers of the infants.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
81
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
40
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 months before study recruitment

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2.0


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-9-24

Curated date: 2024/09/23

Curator: Aleru Divine

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine

Source: Figure 7E

Description: Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) results showing the taxa enriched in the Grandmothers – compared to the other two groups (Infants and Mothers)

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Grandmothers

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Acetanaerobacterium
Akkermansia
Bilophila
Coriobacterium
Deltaproteobacteria
Desulfobaculum
Desulfovibrionaceae
Desulfovibrionales
Olsenella
Parvibacter
Phascolarctobacterium
Porphyromonadaceae
Verrucomicrobiaceae
Verrucomicrobiales
Verrucomicrobiia
Verrucomicrobiota

Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine