Meta-analysis of effects of exclusive breastfeeding on infant gut microbiota across populations/Experiment 5
From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Peace Sandy on 2024-11-19
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- United States of America
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Breastfeeding duration Breastfeeding duration,breastfeeding duration
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Increasing Exclusive Breast Feeding (EBF)
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Reduced exclusivity of beast feeding to none breastfeeding
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Exclusive breastfeeding to infants were reduced.
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 150
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 68
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V4
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- Random Forest Analysis
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.005
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- Yes
Signature 1
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Peace Sandy on 2024-11-19
Source: Table 7
Description: Meta-analysis stratified by mode of delivery for gut bacterial taxa with differential relative abundances between non-exclusively breastfed vs. exclusively breastfed infants ≤6 months of age.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Reduced exclusivity of beast feeding to none breastfeeding
| NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
|---|---|---|
| Acidaminococcus | ||
| Eubacterium | ||
| unclassified Lachnospiraceae | ||
| Bacteroides | ||
| Erysipelotrichaceae | ||
| unclassified Clostridiaceae | ||
| Aggregatibacter | ||
| Lactococcus | ||
| Blautia |
Revision editor(s): Shulamite
Signature 3
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Peace Sandy on 2024-11-19
Source: Table 7
Description: Meta-analysis stratified by mode of delivery for gut bacterial taxa with differential relative abundances between non-exclusively breastfed vs. exclusively breastfed infants ≤6 months of age.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Reduced exclusivity of beast feeding to none breastfeeding
| NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
|---|---|---|
| Anaerotruncus | ||
| Phascolarctobacterium | ||
| Proteus | ||
| Pseudomonadota | ||
| Staphylococcus | ||
| unclassified Enterobacteriaceae |
