Decreased microbial co-occurrence network stability and SCFA receptor level correlates with obesity in African-origin women/Experiment 10
From BugSigDB
Needs review
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- United States of America
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Mus musculus
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Obesity Adiposis,Adiposity,Obese,Obese (finding),obesity,Obesity (disorder),Obesity [Ambiguous],obesity disease,obesity disorder,Obesity NOS,Obesity, unspecified,Overweight and obesity,Obesity
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Lean Americans (UL) humanized mice
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Obese Americans(UO) humanized mice
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Mice humanized by fecal samples from participants in the Obese Americans (GO) group, defined as women from America with a body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m².
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 4
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 4
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V4
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- raw counts
- Statistical test
- Linear Regression
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- Yes
- Confounders controlled for Confounding factors that have been accounted for by stratification or model adjustment
- age
Alpha Diversity
- Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
- unchanged
- Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
- unchanged
- Inverse Simpson Modification of Simpsons index D as 1/D to obtain high values in datasets of high diversity and vice versa
- unchanged
Signature 1
Needs review
Source: Figure S15
Description: Sequences with significantly different levels across the groups in the Murine samples: GL (Ghana Lean), GO (Ghana Obese), UL (USA Lean), and UO (USA Obese).
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Obese Americans(UO) humanized mice
| NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
|---|---|---|
| Eubacteriales |
Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine
