Metagenomic analysis reveals linkages between cecal microbiota and feed efficiency in Xiayan chickens
-
Quality control
- Retracted paper
- Contamination issues suspected
- Batch effect issues suspected
- Uncontrolled confounding suspected
- Results are suspect (various reasons)
- Tags applied
Experiment 1
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- China
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Gallus gallus
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Caecum Blind intestine,Blindgut,Caeca,Caecum,Ceca,Cecum,Intestinum caecum,Intestinum crassum caecum,Intestinum crassum cecum,caecum
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Growth condition GrowthCondition,Growth condition,growth condition
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Male Low Feed Efficiency (L-FE) groups
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Male High Feed Efficiency (H-FE) groups
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Male chickens with the lowest Residual Feed Intake(RFI)
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 3
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 3
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- WMS
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- Not specified
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- LEfSe
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- No
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- 4
Signature 1
Source: Figure 2A
Description: Significant differences in the cecum between Low-FE and High-FE groups in male chickens.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Male High Feed Efficiency (H-FE) groups
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Limosilactobacillus oris | ||
Barnesiella sp. An22 |
Revision editor(s): Tosin
Signature 2
Source: Figure 2A
Description: Significant differences in the cecum between Low-FE and High-FE groups in male chickens.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Male High Feed Efficiency (H-FE) groups
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Helicobacter pullorum | ||
Subdoligranulum variabile | ||
unclassified Lentisphaerota |
Revision editor(s): Tosin
Experiment 2
Subjects
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Growth rate measurement Growth rate measurement,growth rate measurement
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Female Low feed efficiency (L-FE) groups
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Female High Feed efficiency (H-FE) groups
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Female chickens with the lowest Residual Feed Intake (RFI)
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Signature 1
Source: Figure 2B
Description: Significant differences in the cecum between Low-FE and High-FE groups in female chickens.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Female High Feed efficiency (H-FE) groups
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Enterobacteriaceae | ||
Pseudomonadota |
Revision editor(s): Tosin
Signature 2
Source: Figure 2B
Description: Significant differences in the cecum between Low-FE and High-FE groups in female chickens.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Female High Feed efficiency (H-FE) groups
Revision editor(s): Tosin