Longitudinal profiling reveals a persistent intestinal dysbiosis triggered by conventional anti-tuberculosis therapy/Experiment 18

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-4

Curated date: 2024/11/10

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Mus musculus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Response to anti-tuberculosis drug Response to anti-tuberculosis drug,response to anti-tuberculosis drug
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Naive
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
R (Rifampin)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
R (Rifampin) refers to Rifampin treatment given to the uninfected and 4-week Mtb-infected mice.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
3
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
4

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
decreased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-4

Curated date: 2024/11/10

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Additional file 11: Figure S11.

Description: Differentially abundant between the Naive group and Rifampin treatment group.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in R (Rifampin)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Erysipelothrix
Mucispirillum
Anaerosporobacter
Marvinbryantia
Anaerostipes
Gordonibacter
Caloramator
Enterorhabdus

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2025-1-4

Curated date: 2024/11/10

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Additional file 11: Figure S11

Description: Differentially abundant between the Naive group and Rifampin treatment group.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in R (Rifampin)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Acetanaerobacterium
Acetivibrio
Akkermansia
Alistipes
Anaerotruncus
Arthrobacter
Blautia
Butyricicoccus
Clostridium
Dorea
Erysipelotrichaceae
Oxobacter
Parabacteroides
Pelotomaculum
Pseudobacteroides
Pseudobutyrivibrio
Robinsoniella
Ruminococcus
Sporobacter
Stomatobaculum
Turicibacter
Tyzzerella
Romboutsia

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed