Overcoming donor variability and risks associated with fecal microbiota transplants through bacteriophage-mediated treatments/Experiment 3

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/14

Curator: Tosin

Revision editor(s): Tosin

Subjects

Location of subjects
Denmark
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Mus musculus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Clostridium difficile infection clostridium difficile disease,Clostridium difficile infection,clostridium difficile infection
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Euthanized mice
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Survived mice
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Mice that survived the Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) until study termination.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
23
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
24

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
raw counts
Statistical test
DESeq2
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/17

Curator: Tosin

Revision editor(s): Tosin

Source: Figure 7C

Description: Differential abundance of significantly different bacterial taxa between euthanized and survived mice.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Survived mice

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacillota
Clostridium
Lactobacillus taiwanensis
Ligilactobacillus animalis
Limosilactobacillus vaginalis
Turicibacter sanguinis

Revision editor(s): Tosin

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/17

Curator: Tosin

Revision editor(s): Tosin

Source: Figure 7C

Description: Differential abundance of significantly different bacterial taxa between euthanized and survived mice.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Survived mice

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Parasutterella excrementihominis
Parabacteroides goldsteinii
Enterococcus
Escherichia fergusonii
Enterococcus canintestini
Clostridioides difficile
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Akkermansia muciniphila

Revision editor(s): Tosin