Environmental, socioeconomic, and health factors associated with gut microbiome species and strains in isolated Honduras villages/Experiment 9
From BugSigDB
Needs review
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- Honduras
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Environmental exposure measurement Environmental exposure measurement,environmental exposure measurement
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Individual unexposed to animals
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Individual exposed to animals
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Individual exposed to animals refers to the villagers who reported having exposure to different types of animals, including wild animals, farm animals, and pets, affording possible zoonotic transmission.
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- WMS
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- Not specified
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- centered log-ratio
- Statistical test
- Mixed-Effects Regression
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- Yes
- Confounders controlled for Confounding factors that have been accounted for by stratification or model adjustment
- body mass index, sex, Confounders controlled for: "Age" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.Age, Confounders controlled for: "Bristol stool scale" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.Bristol stool scale, Confounders controlled for: "sampling date" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.sampling date, Confounders controlled for: "batch effect" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.batch effect, Confounders controlled for: "DNA concentration" is not in the list (abnormal glucose tolerance, acetaldehyde, acute graft vs. host disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, adenoma, age, AIDS, alcohol consumption measurement, alcohol drinking, ...) of allowed values.DNA concentration
Signature 1
Needs review
Source: Table S1
Description: Differential abundant taxa between individuals exposed or unexposed to animals
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Individual exposed to animals
Revision editor(s): KateRasheed
Signature 2
Needs review
Source: Table S1
Description: Differential abundant taxa between individuals exposed or unexposed to animals
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Individual exposed to animals
Revision editor(s): KateRasheed
