Altered gut microbiota and microbial biomarkers associated with chronic kidney disease
From BugSigDB
Jump to:navigation, search
Study information
-
Quality control
- Retracted paper
- Contamination issues suspected
- Batch effect issues suspected
- Uncontrolled confounding suspected
- Results are suspect (various reasons)
- Tags applied
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Lun H, Yang W, Zhao S, Jiang M, Xu M, Liu F, Wang Y
Journal
MicrobiologyOpen
Year
2019
Keywords:
chronic kidney disease, gut microbiota, hemodialysis, intestinal dysbiosis, microbial biomarker
The present study aimed to determine the differences in gut microbiota between patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and healthy controls (HC) and search for better microbial biomarkers associated with CKD. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach was used to investigate the differences in gut microbiota between the CKD and HC groups. The study found that 12 phylotypes were overrepresented in the CKD group and 19 in the HC group at the genus level. Furthermore, genera Lachnospira and Ruminococcus_gnavus performed the best in differentiating between HC and CKD populations. In addition, this novel study found that the genera Holdemanella, Megamonas, Prevotella 2, Dielma, and Scardovia were associated with the progression of CKD and hemodialysis. In conclusion, the composition of gut microbiota was different in CKD populations compared with healthy populations, and Lachnospira and R._gnavus were better microbial biomarkers. In addition, five phylotypes, including Holdemanella, Megamonas, Prevotella2, Dielma, and Scardovia, served as an indicator of the progression of CKD and hemodialysis. However, large-scale prospective studies should be performed to identify the reliability of the set of these phylotypes as biomarkers.
Experiment 1
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Claregrieve1 on 2022/07/5
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- China
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Chronic kidney disease chronic kidney disease,chronic kidney failure,Chronic Kidney Insufficiencies,Chronic Kidney Insufficiency,chronic renal disease,Chronic Renal Failure,chronic renal failure syndrome,Chronic Renal Insufficiencies,chronic renal insufficiency,CKD,CKD - chronic kidney disease,Disease, End-Stage Kidney,Disease, End-Stage Renal,END STAGE KIDNEY DIS,End Stage Kidney Disease,END STAGE RENAL DIS,End Stage Renal Disease,End-Stage Kidney Disease,End-Stage Renal Disease,End-Stage Renal Failure,ESRD,kidney disease, chronic,Kidney Disease, End-Stage,Kidney Failure, Chronic,Kidney Insufficiencies, Chronic,Kidney Insufficiency, Chronic,RENAL DIS END STAGE,Renal Disease, End Stage,Renal Disease, End-Stage,renal failure - chronic,Renal Failure, Chronic,Renal Failure, End Stage,Renal Failure, End-Stage,Renal Insufficiencies, Chronic,Renal Insufficiency, Chronic,Chronic kidney disease
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- healthy controls
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- chronic kidney disease
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- patients with chronic kidney disease
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 24
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 49
- Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
- 3 months
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V3-V4
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- LEfSe
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- No
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- 2
Signature 1
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Claregrieve1 on 2022/07/6
Source: Figure 3b
Description: Comparison of gut bacteria between the HC and chronic kidney disease groups
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in chronic kidney disease
Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1, WikiWorks
Signature 2
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Claregrieve1 on 2022/07/6
Source: Figure 3b
Description: Comparison of gut bacteria between the HC and chronic kidney disease groups
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in chronic kidney disease
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks
Retrieved from "https://bugsigdb.org/w/index.php?title=Study_166&oldid=82190"
