16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals altered composition of gut microbiota in individuals with kidney stones
From BugSigDB
Jump to:navigation, search
Study information
-
Quality control
- Retracted paper
- Contamination issues suspected
- Batch effect issues suspected
- Uncontrolled confounding suspected
- Results are suspect (various reasons)
- Tags applied
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Tang R, Jiang Y, Tan A, Ye J, Xian X, Xie Y, Wang Q, Yao Z, Mo Z
Journal
Urolithiasis
Year
2018
Keywords:
16S rRNA, Biomarker, Gut microbiota, Nephrolithiasis
Nephrolithiasis is a common urological disease with high prevalence and recurrence rates. Characterizing gut microbiome profiles of nephrolithiasis patients may provide valuable insights and potential biomarkers for the disease. Therefore, we explored the relation between gut microbiome and nephrolithiasis using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing. 13 patients with multiple kidney stones and 13 matched healthy controls were recruited. A decreasing trend in number of observed species in nephrolithiasis patients was detected, although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.086). The inter-group variability in community structure by beta diversity analysis showed a clear separation between nephrolithiasis patients and healthy controls. Twenty genera differentiated significantly in relative abundance between nephrolithiasis patients and healthy controls (all p < 0.05). Among the 20 genera, Phascolarctobacterium, Parasutterella, Ruminiclostridium_5, Erysipelatoclostridium, Fusicatenibacter and Dorea were correlated with the concentration of the trace elements in blood, including potassium, sodium, calcium and chlorinum. Characteristic microbiome in nephrolithiasis patients was also identified by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). These findings may provide novel and non-invasive potential diagnostic biomarkers for nephrolithiasis, and contribute to prevention and treatment of nephrolithiasis from the perspective of maintaining micro-ecological equilibrium in gut.
Experiment 1
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-26
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- China
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Nephrolithiasis , Urolithiasis Calculi, Kidney,Calculi, Renal,calculus of kidney and ureter,Calculus, Kidney,Calculus, Renal,CAON,Kidney Calculi,Kidney Calculus,kidney stone,Kidney Stones,Kidney stones,kidney stones,nephrolithiasis,nephrolithiasis, calcium oxalate,Renal Calculi,Renal calculi,renal calculi,Renal Calculus,Renal stones,Stone - kidney/ureter,Stone, Kidney,Stones, Kidney,urolithiasis, calcium oxalate,Nephrolithiasis,calculus,urinary stones,urolithiasis,Urolithiasis
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- healthy control
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- kidney stone group
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- patients with kidney stones
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 13
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 13
- Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
- 3 months
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V4
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- LEfSe
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 3
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- No
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- 3
- Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
- age, race
Alpha Diversity
- Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
- unchanged
- Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
- unchanged
- Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
- unchanged
Signature 1
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-26
Source: Figure 5
Description: LEfSe analysis based on OTU characterizes microbiome between the Kidney Stone group and HC group.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in kidney stone group
Revision editor(s): KathyWaldron, WikiWorks
Signature 2
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-26
Source: Figure 5
Description: LEfSe analysis based on OTU characterizes microbiome between the Kidney Stone group and HC group.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in kidney stone group
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks
Experiment 2
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2023-11-16
Differences from previous experiment shown
Subjects
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
- Statistical test
- Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- Not specified
Alpha Diversity
- Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
- unchanged
- Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
- unchanged
- Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
- unchanged
Signature 1
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-7-19
Source: Table 2, Figure 2
Description: List of genera that were significantly different between Kidney Stone group and HC group
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in kidney stone group
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks
Signature 2
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-7-19
Source: Table 2, Figure 2
Description: List of genera that were significantly different between Kidney Stone group and HC group
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in kidney stone group
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks
Retrieved from "https://bugsigdb.org/w/index.php?title=Study_245&oldid=82096"
