Fecal metagenomic profiles in subgroups of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Nagy-Szakal D, Williams BL, Mishra N, Che X, Lee B, Bateman L, Klimas NG, Komaroff AL, Levine S, Montoya JG, Peterson DL, Ramanan D, Jain K, Eddy ML, Hornig M, Lipkin WI
Journal
Microbiome
Year
2017
Keywords:
Chronic fatigue syndrome, Irritable bowel syndrome, Metabolic pathway, Metagenomic, Microbiota-gut-brain axis, Myalgic encephalomyelitis, Topological data analysis
BACKGROUND: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is characterized by unexplained persistent fatigue, commonly accompanied by cognitive dysfunction, sleeping disturbances, orthostatic intolerance, fever, lymphadenopathy, and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The extent to which the gastrointestinal microbiome and peripheral inflammation are associated with ME/CFS remains unclear. We pursued rigorous clinical characterization, fecal bacterial metagenomics, and plasma immune molecule analyses in 50 ME/CFS patients and 50 healthy controls frequency-matched for age, sex, race/ethnicity, geographic site, and season of sampling. RESULTS: Topological analysis revealed associations between IBS co-morbidity, body mass index, fecal bacterial composition, and bacterial metabolic pathways but not plasma immune molecules. IBS co-morbidity was the strongest driving factor in the separation of topological networks based on bacterial profiles and metabolic pathways. Predictive selection models based on bacterial profiles supported findings from topological analyses indicating that ME/CFS subgroups, defined by IBS status, could be distinguished from control subjects with high predictive accuracy. Bacterial taxa predictive of ME/CFS patients with IBS were distinct from taxa associated with ME/CFS patients without IBS. Increased abundance of unclassified Alistipes and decreased Faecalibacterium emerged as the top biomarkers of ME/CFS with IBS; while increased unclassified Bacteroides abundance and decreased Bacteroides vulgatus were the top biomarkers of ME/CFS without IBS. Despite findings of differences in bacterial taxa and metabolic pathways defining ME/CFS subgroups, decreased metabolic pathways associated with unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis and increased atrazine degradation pathways were independent of IBS co-morbidity. Increased vitamin B6 biosynthesis/salvage and pyrimidine ribonucleoside degradation were the top metabolic pathways in ME/CFS without IBS as well as in the total ME/CFS cohort. In ME/CFS subgroups, symptom severity measures including pain, fatigue, and reduced motivation were correlated with the abundance of distinct bacterial taxa and metabolic pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of IBS, ME/CFS is associated with dysbiosis and distinct bacterial metabolic disturbances that may influence disease severity. However, our findings indicate that dysbiotic features that are uniquely ME/CFS-associated may be masked by disturbances arising from the high prevalence of IBS co-morbidity in ME/CFS. These insights may enable more accurate diagnosis and lead to insights that inform the development of specific therapeutic strategies in ME/CFS subgroups.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Victoria

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Chronic fatigue syndrome CFS,chronic fatigue syndrome,myalgic encephalitis,myalgic encephalomeyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome,Myalgic Encephalomyelitis,myalgic encephalomyelitis,Postviral fatigue syndrome,systemic exertion intolerance disease,Chronic fatigue syndrome
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
controls
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
CFS/ME patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Cases met the 1994 CDC Fukuda and the 2003 Canadian consensus criteria for ME/CFS
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
50
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
50
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 months for controls only

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.2
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, ethnic group, geographic area, sex


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2021/07/28

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): Fatima, WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3a

Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME and healthy controls

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in CFS/ME patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaerostipes
Anaerostipes caccae
Clostridiaceae
Clostridium
Coprobacillus
Enterocloster asparagiformis
Pseudoflavonifractor
Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus
[Clostridium] scindens
[Clostridium] symbiosum
Mediterraneibacter gnavus
Coprobacillus cateniformis

Revision editor(s): Fatima, WikiWorks

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2021/07/28

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): Lwaldron, Fatima, WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3a

Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME and healthy controls

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in CFS/ME patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Alistipes putredinis
Anaerobutyricum hallii
Blautia obeum
Coprococcus
Coprococcus catus
Dorea
Dorea formicigenerans
Dorea longicatena
Eubacterium ventriosum
Faecalibacterium
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
Gemella
Haemophilus
Haemophilus parainfluenzae
Lachnospiraceae
Parabacteroides distasonis
Pasteurellaceae
Pasteurellales
Roseburia
Roseburia inulinivorans
Faecalibacterium sp.

Revision editor(s): Lwaldron, Fatima, WikiWorks

Experiment 2


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
CFS/ME patients with IBS
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
21

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
Not specified
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, sex, ethnic group, geographic area


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3b

Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME with IBS and healthy controls

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in CFS/ME patients with IBS

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaerostipes caccae
Clostridium
Clostridiaceae
Enterocloster bolteae
Anaerostipes

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): Lwaldron, WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3b

Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME with IBS and healthy controls

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in CFS/ME patients with IBS

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaerobutyricum hallii
Coprococcus
Coprococcus catus
Coprococcus comes
Dorea
Dorea formicigenerans
Dorea longicatena
Faecalibacterium
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
Lachnospiraceae
Roseburia
Roseburia inulinivorans
Faecalibacterium sp.
Blautia obeum

Revision editor(s): Lwaldron, WikiWorks

Experiment 3


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
CFS/ME patients without IBS
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
29

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2021/07/28

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): Lwaldron, Fatima, WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3c

Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME without IBS and healthy controls

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in CFS/ME patients without IBS

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Azotobacter group
Clostridiaceae
Clostridium
Coprobacillus
Coprobacillus cateniformis
Dorea longicatena
Eggerthella
Eggerthella lenta
Pseudoflavonifractor
Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus
Pseudomonadales
Pseudomonas
[Clostridium] scindens
[Clostridium] symbiosum
Mediterraneibacter gnavus
Clostridium sp.

Revision editor(s): Lwaldron, Fatima, WikiWorks

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3c

Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME without IBS and healthy controls

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in CFS/ME patients without IBS

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Coprococcus catus
Parabacteroides distasonis
Dorea formicigenerans
Dorea

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks