Fecal metagenomic profiles in subgroups of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome
-
Quality control
- Retracted paper
- Contamination issues suspected
- Batch effect issues suspected
- Uncontrolled confounding suspected
- Results are suspect (various reasons)
- Tags applied
Experiment 1
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- United States of America
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Chronic fatigue syndrome CFS,chronic fatigue syndrome,myalgic encephalitis,myalgic encephalomeyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome,Myalgic Encephalomyelitis,myalgic encephalomyelitis,Postviral fatigue syndrome,systemic exertion intolerance disease,Chronic fatigue syndrome
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- controls
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- CFS/ME patients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Cases met the 1994 CDC Fukuda and the 2003 Canadian consensus criteria for ME/CFS
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 50
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 50
- Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
- 3 months for controls only
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- WMS
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- Not specified
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- LEfSe
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.2
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- Yes
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- 2
- Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
- age, ethnic group, geographic area, sex
Signature 1
Source: Figure 3a
Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME and healthy controls
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in CFS/ME patients
Signature 2
Source: Figure 3a
Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME and healthy controls
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in CFS/ME patients
Experiment 2
Subjects
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- CFS/ME patients with IBS
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 21
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- Not specified
- Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
- age, sex, ethnic group, geographic area
Signature 1
Source: Figure 3b
Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME with IBS and healthy controls
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in CFS/ME patients with IBS
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Anaerostipes caccae | ||
Clostridium | ||
Clostridiaceae | ||
Enterocloster bolteae | ||
Anaerostipes |
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks
Signature 2
Source: Figure 3b
Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME with IBS and healthy controls
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in CFS/ME patients with IBS
Experiment 3
Subjects
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- CFS/ME patients without IBS
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 29
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Signature 1
Source: Figure 3c
Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME without IBS and healthy controls
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in CFS/ME patients without IBS
Signature 2
Source: Figure 3c
Description: Differentiately abundant mictobiota between CFS/ME without IBS and healthy controls
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in CFS/ME patients without IBS
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Coprococcus catus | ||
Parabacteroides distasonis | ||
Dorea formicigenerans | ||
Dorea |
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks