Temporal association between human upper respiratory and gut bacterial microbiomes during the course of COVID-19 in adults

From BugSigDB
Needs review
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Xu R, Lu R, Zhang T, Wu Q, Cai W, Han X, Wan Z, Jin X, Zhang Z, Zhang C
Journal
Communications biology
Year
2021
SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of COVID-19. It infects multiple organs including the respiratory tract and gut. Dynamic changes of regional microbiomes in infected adults are largely unknown. Here, we performed longitudinal analyses of throat and anal swabs from 35 COVID-19 and 19 healthy adult controls, as well as 10 non-COVID-19 patients with other diseases, by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. The results showed a partitioning of the patients into 3-4 categories based on microbial community types (I-IV) in both sites. The bacterial diversity was lower in COVID-19 patients than healthy controls and decreased gradually from community type I to III/IV. Although the dynamic change of microbiome was complex during COVID-19, a synchronous restoration of both the upper respiratory and gut microbiomes from early dysbiosis towards late more diverse status was observed in 6/8 mild COVID-19 adult patients. These findings reveal previously unknown interactions between upper respiratory and gut microbiomes during COVID-19.

Experiment 1


Needs review

Curated date: 2021/06/28

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1, WikiWorks

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Oropharynx Mesopharynx,Oral part of pharynx,Pars oralis pharyngis,Oropharynx,oropharynx
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
COVID-19 2019 novel coronavirus,2019 novel coronavirus infection,2019-nCoV,2019-nCoV infection,beta-CoV,beta-CoVs,betacoronavirus,coronavirus disease 2019,SARS-coronavirus 2,SARS-CoV-2,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infectious disease,β-coronavirus,β-CoV,β-CoVs,COVID-19,cOVID-19
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy controls (Group H)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Non-COVID-19 patients (Group NP)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
6 COVID-19 patients, 10 non-COVID-19 patients, 2 healthy controls
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
13
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
18

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
ANOSIM
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
unchanged
Richness Number of species
decreased

Experiment 2


Needs review

Curated date: 2021/06/28

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Community Type I Patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
16 COVID-19 patients, 2 healthy controls

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
increased
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Experiment 3


Needs review

Curated date: 2021/06/28

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Community Type II patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
47 COVID-19 patients, 1 healthy control
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
48

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
increased
Richness Number of species
decreased

Experiment 4


Needs review

Curated date: 2021/06/28

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Community Type III patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
10 COVID-19 patients, 1 healthy control
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
11

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
decreased
Richness Number of species
decreased

Experiment 5


Needs review

Curated date: 2021/06/28

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): Claregrieve1, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Community Type IV patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
4 COVID-19 patients
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
4

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
decreased
Richness Number of species
decreased

Experiment 6


Needs review

Curated date: 2021/07/10

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): LGeistlinger, Claregrieve1, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Rectum Intestinum rectum,Rectal sac,Terminal portion of intestine,Terminal portion of large intestine,Rectum,rectum
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Group I - High Diversity COVID-19 patients
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Group II - Medium Diversity COVID-19 patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Patients with medium microbial diversity in rectal samples
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
15
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
24

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
unchanged
Richness Number of species
decreased

Experiment 7


Needs review

Curated date: 2021/07/10

Curator: Claregrieve1

Revision editor(s): LGeistlinger, Claregrieve1, WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Group III - Low Diversity COVID-19 patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Patients with low microbial diversity in rectal swab samples

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
decreased
Richness Number of species
decreased