Temporal association between human upper respiratory and gut bacterial microbiomes during the course of COVID-19 in adults
From BugSigDB
Jump to:navigation, search
Study information
-
Quality control
- Retracted paper
- Contamination issues suspected
- Batch effect issues suspected
- Uncontrolled confounding suspected
- Results are suspect (various reasons)
- Tags applied
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Xu R, Lu R, Zhang T, Wu Q, Cai W, Han X, Wan Z, Jin X, Zhang Z, Zhang C
Journal
Communications biology
Year
2021
SARS-CoV-2 is the cause of COVID-19. It infects multiple organs including the respiratory tract and gut. Dynamic changes of regional microbiomes in infected adults are largely unknown. Here, we performed longitudinal analyses of throat and anal swabs from 35 COVID-19 and 19 healthy adult controls, as well as 10 non-COVID-19 patients with other diseases, by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. The results showed a partitioning of the patients into 3-4 categories based on microbial community types (I-IV) in both sites. The bacterial diversity was lower in COVID-19 patients than healthy controls and decreased gradually from community type I to III/IV. Although the dynamic change of microbiome was complex during COVID-19, a synchronous restoration of both the upper respiratory and gut microbiomes from early dysbiosis towards late more diverse status was observed in 6/8 mild COVID-19 adult patients. These findings reveal previously unknown interactions between upper respiratory and gut microbiomes during COVID-19.
Experiment 1
Needs review
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- China
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Oropharynx Mesopharynx,Oral part of pharynx,Pars oralis pharyngis,Oropharynx,oropharynx
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- COVID-19 2019 novel coronavirus,2019 novel coronavirus infection,2019-nCoV,2019-nCoV infection,beta-CoV,beta-CoVs,betacoronavirus,coronavirus disease 2019,SARS-coronavirus 2,SARS-CoV-2,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infectious disease,β-coronavirus,β-CoV,β-CoVs,COVID-19,cOVID-19
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Healthy controls (Group H)
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Non-COVID-19 patients (Group NP)
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- 6 COVID-19 patients, 10 non-COVID-19 patients, 2 healthy controls
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 13
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 18
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V4
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Statistical test
- ANOSIM
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- Yes
Alpha Diversity
- Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
- unchanged
- Richness Number of species
- decreased
Experiment 2
Needs review
Differences from previous experiment shown
Subjects
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Community Type I Patients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- 16 COVID-19 patients, 2 healthy controls
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Alpha Diversity
- Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
- increased
- Richness Number of species
- unchanged
Experiment 3
Needs review
Differences from previous experiment shown
Subjects
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Community Type II patients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- 47 COVID-19 patients, 1 healthy control
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 48
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Alpha Diversity
- Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
- increased
- Richness Number of species
- decreased
Experiment 4
Needs review
Differences from previous experiment shown
Subjects
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Community Type III patients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- 10 COVID-19 patients, 1 healthy control
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 11
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Alpha Diversity
- Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
- decreased
- Richness Number of species
- decreased
Experiment 5
Needs review
Differences from previous experiment shown
Subjects
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Community Type IV patients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- 4 COVID-19 patients
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 4
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Alpha Diversity
- Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
- decreased
- Richness Number of species
- decreased
Experiment 6
Needs review
Curated date: 2021/07/10
Curator: Claregrieve1
Revision editor(s): LGeistlinger, Claregrieve1, WikiWorks
Differences from previous experiment shown
Subjects
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Rectum Intestinum rectum,Rectal sac,Terminal portion of intestine,Terminal portion of large intestine,Rectum,rectum
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Group I - High Diversity COVID-19 patients
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Group II - Medium Diversity COVID-19 patients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Patients with medium microbial diversity in rectal samples
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 15
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 24
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Alpha Diversity
- Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
- unchanged
- Richness Number of species
- decreased
Experiment 7
Needs review
Curated date: 2021/07/10
Curator: Claregrieve1
Revision editor(s): LGeistlinger, Claregrieve1, WikiWorks
Differences from previous experiment shown
Subjects
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Group III - Low Diversity COVID-19 patients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Patients with low microbial diversity in rectal swab samples
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
Alpha Diversity
- Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
- decreased
- Richness Number of species
- decreased
Retrieved from "https://bugsigdb.org/w/index.php?title=Study_475&oldid=82557"