Gut microbiota in patients after surgical treatment for colorectal cancer
-
Quality control
- Retracted paper
- Contamination issues suspected
- Batch effect issues suspected
- Uncontrolled confounding suspected
- Results are suspect (various reasons)
- Tags applied
Experiment 1
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- China
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Colorectal cancer cancer of colorectum,cancer of large bowel,cancer of large intestine,cancer of the large bowel,colon cancer,colorectal cancer,colorectum cancer,CRC,large intestine cancer,malignant colorectal neoplasm,malignant colorectal tumor,malignant colorectum neoplasm,malignant large bowel neoplasm,malignant large bowel tumor,malignant large intestine neoplasm,malignant large intestine tumor,malignant neoplasm of colorectum,malignant neoplasm of large bowel,malignant neoplasm of large intestine,malignant neoplasm of the large bowel,malignant neoplasm of the large intestine,malignant tumor of large bowel,malignant tumor of large intestine,malignant tumor of the large bowel,malignant tumor of the large intestine,Colorectal cancer
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- postoperation patients
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Carcinoma patients
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- The adenoma and carcinoma patients were diagnosed by colonoscopic examination and histopathological review of biopsies. Postoperative patients were classified as having NDA or CIT by follow-up surveillance colonoscopy and biopsies
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 47
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 15
- Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
- 3 months
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V3-V4
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.1
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- Yes
- Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
- age, body mass index, sex
Alpha Diversity
- Richness Number of species
- unchanged
Signature 1
Source: Supplemental Figure 5 and Table S2
Description: The relative abundance of genus in carcinoma and postoperative patients
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Carcinoma patients
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks
Signature 2
Source: Supplemental Figure 5 and Table S2
Description: The relative abundance of genus in carcinoma and postoperative patients
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Carcinoma patients
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Leptotrichia | ||
Parascardovia | ||
Bifidobacterium | ||
Microbacterium | ||
Lawsonella | ||
Faecalitalea | ||
Sutterella | ||
Lachnospira | ||
Tyzzerella | ||
Klebsiella | ||
Mediterraneibacter gnavus |
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks
Experiment 2
Subjects
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- CIT(cleain intestine)
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- NDA(new dev. adenoma)
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 26
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 21
Lab analysis
Statistical Analysis
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
- 2.5
Alpha Diversity
- Richness Number of species
- decreased
Signature 1
Source: Figure 4 and Table B
Description: LEfSe identified differene in abundace between NDA and CIT
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in NDA(new dev. adenoma)
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Abiotrophia | ||
Atopobium | ||
Morganella | ||
Prevotella | ||
Solobacterium |
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks
Signature 2
Source: Figure 4 and Table B
Description: LEfSe identified differene in abundace between NDA and CIT
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in NDA(new dev. adenoma)
NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
---|---|---|
Butyricimonas | ||
Ruminococcus | ||
Clostridium | ||
Coprococcus | ||
Finegoldia | ||
Eubacterium coprostanoligenes | ||
Moryella | ||
Oscillibacter | ||
Desulfovibrio | ||
Anaerotruncus |
Revision editor(s): WikiWorks