Colorectal Cancer Stage-Specific Fecal Bacterial Community Fingerprinting of the Taiwanese Population and Underpinning of Potential Taxonomic Biomarkers/Experiment 3

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Chloe on 2023-3-8

Curated date: 2023/03/08

Curator: Chloe

Revision editor(s): Chloe

Subjects

Location of subjects
Taiwan
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Intestinal polyp intestinal polyp,intestinal polyp (disease),Intestinal Polyps,Polyp, Intestinal,Polyps, Intestinal,Intestinal polyp
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
polyps patients
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
cancer patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
persons aged 25–95 years old with cancerous large intestine tumor symptoms
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
21
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
21
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
1 month

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
Metastats
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Chloe on 2023-3-8

Curated date: 2023/03/08

Curator: Chloe

Revision editor(s): Chloe

Source: Figure 4

Description: The post hoc plots of enriched bacterial genera among three health conditions (healthy, polyps, and cancer). The left side of these figures shows the abundance ratio of differentially enriched bacterial genera. The right side represents the significant difference at p < 0.05, whereas the middle one indicates the mean proportion of differentially enriched bacterial genera in the 95% confidence interval.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in cancer patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomyces
Campylobacter
Enterococcus
Slackia
Pyramidobacter
Coriobacterium
Methanobrevibacter
Peptostreptococcus
Abiotrophia
Coxiella
Haloferula
Leuconostoc
Weissella

Revision editor(s): Chloe

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Chloe on 2023-3-8

Curated date: 2023/03/08

Curator: Chloe

Revision editor(s): Chloe

Source: Figure 4

Description:

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in cancer patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Aeromonas
Sporobacterium
Oscillospira
Mitsuokella
Streptobacillus

Revision editor(s): Chloe