Potential of fecal microbiota for early-stage detection of colorectal cancer/Experiment 3

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2023-3-7

Curated date: 2023/03/07

Curator: Fatima

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Lwaldron, Fatima, Victoria

Subjects

Location of subjects
France
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Colorectal carcinoma cancer of large bowel,cancer of large intestine,cancer of the large bowel,cancer of the large intestine,carcinoma of colorectum,carcinoma of large bowel,carcinoma of large intestine,carcinoma of the large bowel,carcinoma of the large intestine,colorectal (colon or rectal) cancer,colorectal cancer,colorectal carcinoma,colorectum carcinoma,CRC,large bowel cancer,large bowel carcinoma,large intestine cancer,large intestine carcinoma,Colorectal carcinoma
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Neoplasia free
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Adenoma patients
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
patients referred for colonoscopy that had cancerous tumors
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
61
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
42
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
none

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
.1
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
Confounders controlled for Confounding factors that have been accounted for by stratification or model adjustment
age, body mass index, sex

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2023-3-7

Curated date: 2023/03/07

Curator: Fatima

Revision editor(s): Fatima

Source: Supplementary Figure S2

Description: significant differences in the abundance of specific taxa between Adenoma patients and neoplasia free

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Adenoma patients

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Ruminococcus

Revision editor(s): Fatima