Microbiota profile is different for early and invasive colorectal cancer and is consistent throughout the colon

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/07/6
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Burt AD, Fujishiro M, Hattori S, Hirooka Y, Honda T, Nakamura M, Singh R, Yamamoto K, Yamamura T, Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L
Journal
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Year
2020
Pages:
5
First page:
433
Keywords:
colonoscopy, colorectal neoplasms, fusobacterium nucleatum, gastrointestinal microbiome, microbiota
Background and aim: Microbiota have been associated with several diseases including colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to evaluate the microbiota in early/invasive CRC utilizing stool and cytological brushes to determine differences in relative abundance (RA).

Methods: Colonoscopy patients referred for endoscopic submucosal dissection or previous to CRC surgery were prospectively enrolled. Stool was collected pre-bowel preparation; and brush samples were taken during colonoscopy (three regions). DNA extraction, 16S rRNA next generation sequencing, and biostatistics (qiime and stamp software packages) followed. Primary outcome was the difference in RA of the Fusobacterium genus between the groups. Secondary outcomes included analyses of other microbiota.

Results: Twenty-five patients were included, of which 14 had invasive cancer (≥ 1000 mm into the submucosa). The three major genera for invasive cancer were Bacterioides, Oribacterium, and Fusobacterium, whereas for early cancer were Oribacterium, Bacterioides, and Prevotella (decreasing order of RA). There was a significantly higher RA of Fusobacterium in the invasive cancer group (9.65% vs 0.95%, respectively, P < 0.001). The RA of all genera was similar throughout the colon. In addition to Fusobacterium, the genera Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, Neisseria, Porphyromonas, and Sclegelella showed statistically higher RA in the invasive cancer group. Conversely, the genera Oribacterium, Desulfovibrio, Clostridiales, and Lactobacillus showed lower RA in the invasive cancer group.

Conclusions: The RA of Fusobacterium is higher with invasive CRC than in early CRC patients. In addition, five other bacteria genera were found to be increased, and four decreased in invasive CRC patients. The microbiota per patient was similar throughout the colon.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/07/6

Curated date: 2022/05/24

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Fatima, WikiWorks

Subjects

Location of subjects
Japan
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Colon Hindgut,Large bowel,Posterior intestine,Colon,colon
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Colorectal cancer cancer of colorectum,cancer of large bowel,cancer of large intestine,cancer of the large bowel,colon cancer,colorectal cancer,colorectum cancer,CRC,large intestine cancer,malignant colorectal neoplasm,malignant colorectal tumor,malignant colorectum neoplasm,malignant large bowel neoplasm,malignant large bowel tumor,malignant large intestine neoplasm,malignant large intestine tumor,malignant neoplasm of colorectum,malignant neoplasm of large bowel,malignant neoplasm of large intestine,malignant neoplasm of the large bowel,malignant neoplasm of the large intestine,malignant tumor of large bowel,malignant tumor of large intestine,malignant tumor of the large bowel,malignant tumor of the large intestine,Colorectal cancer
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Early cancer group
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Invasive cancer group
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Patients undergoing ESD procedure for colorectal cancer
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
11
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
14

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
Welch's T-Test
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/07/18

Curated date: 2022/05/24

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Fatima

Source: Figure 1, Figure 5, Figure 4

Description: Figure 1: Fusobacterium genera profile for invasive (YES) and early (NO) colorectal cancer.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Invasive cancer group

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Fusobacterium
Fusobacterium vincentii
Fusobacterium sp.

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Fatima

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/07/18

Curated date: 2022/07/09

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Fatima

Source: Figure 2, Figure 3

Description: Oribacterium parvum profile for invasive (YES) and early (NO) colorectal cancer (colon samples).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Invasive cancer group

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Oribacterium parvum
Clostridiales bacterium

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Fatima