Fusobacterium nucleatum Promotes Chemoresistance to Colorectal Cancer by Modulating Autophagy

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/07/25
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Yu T, Guo F, Yu Y, Sun T, Ma D, Han J, Qian Y, Kryczek I, Sun D, Nagarsheth N, Chen Y, Chen H, Hong J, Zou W, Fang JY
Journal
Cell
Year
2017
Keywords:
Colorectal cancer, F.nucleatum, Toll-like receptor, autophagy, chemoresistance, miRNA, recurrence
Gut microbiota are linked to chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis. Chemotherapy failure is the major cause of recurrence and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Here, we investigated the contribution of gut microbiota to chemoresistance in patients with colorectal cancer. We found that Fusobacterium (F.) nucleatum was abundant in colorectal cancer tissues in patients with recurrence post chemotherapy, and was associated with patient clinicopathological characterisitcs. Furthermore, our bioinformatic and functional studies demonstrated that F. nucleatum promoted colorectal cancer resistance to chemotherapy. Mechanistically, F. nucleatum targeted TLR4 and MYD88 innate immune signaling and specific microRNAs to activate the autophagy pathway and alter colorectal cancer chemotherapeutic response. Thus, F. nucleatum orchestrates a molecular network of the Toll-like receptor, microRNAs, and autophagy to clinically, biologically, and mechanistically control colorectal cancer chemoresistance. Measuring and targeting F. nucleatum and its associated pathway will yield valuable insight into clinical management and may ameliorate colorectal cancer patient outcomes.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/07/25

Curated date: 2022/06/04

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, WikiWorks, Peace Sandy

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Intestine Bowel,Intestinal tract,Intestine,intestine
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Colorectal cancer cancer of colorectum,cancer of large bowel,cancer of large intestine,cancer of the large bowel,colon cancer,colorectal cancer,colorectum cancer,CRC,large intestine cancer,malignant colorectal neoplasm,malignant colorectal tumor,malignant colorectum neoplasm,malignant large bowel neoplasm,malignant large bowel tumor,malignant large intestine neoplasm,malignant large intestine tumor,malignant neoplasm of colorectum,malignant neoplasm of large bowel,malignant neoplasm of large intestine,malignant neoplasm of the large bowel,malignant neoplasm of the large intestine,malignant tumor of large bowel,malignant tumor of large intestine,malignant tumor of the large bowel,malignant tumor of the large intestine,Colorectal cancer
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Patients without CRC recurrence
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Patients with CRC recurrence
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Patient tissues with colorectal cancer recurrence
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
16
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
15
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V1-V3
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Roche454

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
3.5


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/07/25

Curated date: 2022/06/04

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy

Source: Figure 1B

Description: (B) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with the effect size measurements identifies the significant abundance of data in A. Taxa enriched in recurrent (Red) and non-recurrent (Blue) patients are indicated with negative (Red) or positive (Blue) LDA scores, respectively. Only taxa greater than LDA threshold of 3.5 are shown.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Patients with CRC recurrence

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Fusobacterium
Parvimonas
Anaerobacterium
Peptostreptococcus
Prevotella

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/07/25

Curated date: 2022/06/04

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy

Source: Figure 1B

Description: Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) coupled with the effect size measurements identifies the significant abundance of data in A. Taxa enriched in recurrent (Red) and non-recurrent (Blue) patients are indicated with negative (Red) or positive (Blue) LDA scores, respectively. Only taxa greater than LDA threshold of 3.5 are shown.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Patients with CRC recurrence

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Stenotrophomonas
Veillonella

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy