Effect of electronic cigarette and tobacco smoking on the human saliva microbial community

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-20
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Wang X, Mi Q, Yang J, Guan Y, Zeng W, Xiang H, Liu X, Yang W, Yang G, Li X, Cui Y, Gao Q
Journal
Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]
Year
2022
Keywords:
Community profiles, E-cigarettes, Oral microbial flora, Smoking
Increasing evidence demonstrated the oral microbial community profile characteristics affected by conventional cigarettes smoking, but few studies focus on oral microbiome in response to electronic cigarettes (E-cigarettes). This study aimed to investigate the effect of E-cigarettes on the oral microbiome and to describe the difference of oral community profiles between E-cigarette smokers and tobacco smokers. 16S rRNA V4 gene sequencing was performed to investigate the oral microbial profiles of 5 E-cigarette smokers, 14 tobacco smokers, 8 quitting tobacco smokers, and 6 nonsmokers. The Chao1, ACE, and Shannon diversity indexes increased significantly in saliva samples collected from E-cigarette smokers and tobacco smokers compared to the non-smokers, and no significant difference was found in alpha diversity between E-cigarette smokers and tobacco smokers. The main phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria and major genera Neisseria, Streptococcus, Prevotellaceae, Fusobacterium, and Porphyromonas dominated in the smoking groups, while Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria became the dominant phyla along with the genera Corynebacterium, Neisseria, Streptococcus, Actinomyces, and Porphyromonas in the nonsmokers. The differences in the phylum Actinobacteria and genus Corynebacterium contributed to various functional differences between smokers and nonsmokers. The difference on oral microbial and composition between E-cigarettes and common tobacco were associated with increased Prevotellaceae and decreased Neisseria. Additionally, smoking cessation could lead to re-establishment of the oral microbiome to that of nonsmokers. Our data demonstrate that E-cigarette smoking had different effects on the structure and composition of the oral microbial community compared to tobacco smoking. However, the short- and long-term impact of E-cigarette smoking on microbiome composition and function needs further exploration.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/03/14

Curator: Annabelcute

Revision editor(s): Annabelcute, Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Saliva Sailva normalis,Saliva atomaris,Saliva molecularis,Salivary gland secretion,Saliva,saliva
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Smoking behavior smoking,Smoking behavior,smoking behavior
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Non Smokers
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Tobacco smokers
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
The volunteers who smoked tobacco
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
6
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
14
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4-V5
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Ion Torrent

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
ANOVA
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
increased
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-20

Curated date: 2023/03/14

Curator: Annabelcute

Revision editor(s): Annabelcute, Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Source: Figure 4 (C-F)

Description: The relative abundances of Neisseria, Prevotellaceae, Corynebacterium, and Porphyromonas in the two groups.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Tobacco smokers

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Prevotellaceae
Porphyromonas

Revision editor(s): Annabelcute, Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Experiment 2


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/06

Curator: Aiyshaaaa

Revision editor(s): Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
E-cigarette smokers
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
The volunteers who smoked electronic cigarettes.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
5

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
increased
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/06

Curator: Aiyshaaaa

Revision editor(s): Aiyshaaaa

Source: Figure 4 (C-F)

Description: The relative abundances of Neisseria, Prevotellaceae, Corynebacterium, and Porphyromonas in the two groups.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in E-cigarette smokers

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Neisseria
Corynebacterium

Revision editor(s): Aiyshaaaa

Experiment 3


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/06

Curator: Aiyshaaaa

Revision editor(s): Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Tobacco smokers
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
14

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/06

Curator: Aiyshaaaa

Revision editor(s): Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Source: Figure 4 (C-F)

Description: The relative abundances of Neisseria, Prevotellaceae, Corynebacterium, and Porphyromonas in the two groups.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in E-cigarette smokers

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Neisseria

Revision editor(s): Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/06

Curator: Aiyshaaaa

Revision editor(s): Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Source: Figure 4 (C-F)

Description: The relative abundances of Neisseria, Prevotellaceae, Corynebacterium, and Porphyromonas in the two groups.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in E-cigarette smokers

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Prevotellaceae

Revision editor(s): Aiyshaaaa, Atrayees

Experiment 5


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/20

Curator: Atrayees

Revision editor(s): Atrayees

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Quitting smokers
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Tobacco smokers
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Volunteers who are tobacco smokers
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
8
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
14
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 months.

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
increased
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/20

Curator: Atrayees

Revision editor(s): Atrayees

Source: Figure 4(C-F)

Description: The relative abundances of Neisseria, Prevotellaceae, Corynebacterium, and Porphyromonas in the two groups.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Tobacco smokers

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Prevotellaceae
Porphyromonas

Revision editor(s): Atrayees

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/21

Curator: Atrayees

Revision editor(s): Atrayees

Source: Figure 4(C-F)

Description: The relative abundances of Neisseria, Prevotellaceae, Corynebacterium, and Porphyromonas in the two groups.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Tobacco smokers

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Corynebacterium

Revision editor(s): Atrayees

Experiment 6


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by ChiomaBlessing on 2024-2-21

Curated date: 2023/06/20

Curator: Atrayees

Revision editor(s): Atrayees

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
E-cigarette smokers
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Volunteers who smoke E-cigarettes
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
5

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Atrayees on 2023-6-21

Curated date: 2023/06/20

Curator: Atrayees

Revision editor(s): Atrayees

Source: Figure 4(C-F)

Description: The relative abundances of Neisseria, Prevotellaceae, Corynebacterium, and Porphyromonas in the two groups.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in E-cigarette smokers

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Corynebacterium

Revision editor(s): Atrayees