Dysbiosis of human gut microbiome in young-onset colorectal cancer/Experiment 2

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Claregrieve1 on 2022/11/11

Curated date: 2022/06/24

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Claregrieve1, Jeshudy, Victoria

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Colorectal cancer cancer of colorectum,cancer of large bowel,cancer of large intestine,cancer of the large bowel,colon cancer,colorectal cancer,colorectum cancer,CRC,large intestine cancer,malignant colorectal neoplasm,malignant colorectal tumor,malignant colorectum neoplasm,malignant large bowel neoplasm,malignant large bowel tumor,malignant large intestine neoplasm,malignant large intestine tumor,malignant neoplasm of colorectum,malignant neoplasm of large bowel,malignant neoplasm of large intestine,malignant neoplasm of the large bowel,malignant neoplasm of the large intestine,malignant tumor of large bowel,malignant tumor of large intestine,malignant tumor of the large bowel,malignant tumor of the large intestine,Colorectal cancer
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
oControls
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
oCRC
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
old-onset CRC patients (50 years old or older)
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
203
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
233
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
1 month

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2.0
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age
Confounders controlled for Confounding factors that have been accounted for by stratification or model adjustment
age, sex

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased
Richness Number of species
decreased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Claregrieve1 on 2022/11/11

Curated date: 2022/06/24

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Claregrieve1

Source: Figure 3A

Description: Differential microbial abundance between oCRC and oControl groups

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in oCRC

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Agathobacter
Anaerostipes
Bilophila
Blautia
Blautia sp.
Butyricicoccus
Christensenellaceae
Clostridium
Clostridium butyricum
Collinsella
Coprococcus
Erysipelotrichaceae
Eubacterium coprostanoligenes
Eubacterium ventriosum
Faecalibacterium
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
Fusicatenibacter
Lachnospira
Lachnospira eligens
Lachnospiraceae
Monoglobus
Parasutterella
Phascolarctobacterium
Romboutsia
Roseburia
Roseburia hominis
Roseburia intestinalis
Ruminococcus
Ruminococcus bicirculans (ex Wegman et al. 2014)
Ruminococcus champanellensis
Subdoligranulum
Agathobacter rectalis

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Claregrieve1

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Claregrieve1 on 2022/11/11

Curated date: 2022/06/24

Curator: Jeshudy

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Claregrieve1

Source: Figure 3A

Description: Differential microbial abundance between oCRC and oControl groups

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in oCRC

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Brevundimonas
Eggerthella
Eggerthella lenta
Enterocloster bolteae
Thomasclavelia
Escherichia
Faecalibacterium sp. UBA1819
Fusobacterium
Gemella
Haemophilus
Hungatella
Lachnoclostridium
Massilistercora timonensis
Parvimonas
Peptostreptococcus
Shigella
Streptococcus
[Clostridium] scindens

Revision editor(s): Jeshudy, Claregrieve1