Ethnic variability associating gut and oral microbiome with obesity in children/Experiment 2

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-1-31

Curated date: 2022/06/29

Curator: Kaluifeanyi101

Revision editor(s): Kaluifeanyi101, WikiWorks, Folakunmi

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Oral opening Mouth,Oral fissure,Oral orifice,Oral part of face,Oral opening,oral opening
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Ethnic group Ethnicity,race,Ethnic group,ethnic group
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Oral microbiota of European American children (EA)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Oral microbiota of African American children (AA)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Oral microbiota of 30 African American children (18 female, 12 male; age 6 - 10 years)
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
30
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
30
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
unspecified

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V5
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
PERMANOVA
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes
Confounders controlled for Confounding factors that have been accounted for by stratification or model adjustment
age, body mass index, household income, education level, sex

Alpha Diversity

Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-1-30

Curated date: 2022/06/29

Curator: Kaluifeanyi101

Revision editor(s): Kaluifeanyi101, Folakunmi

Source: Figure 2C

Description: Genus-level differentially abundant taxa in the oral microbiota comparison between AA and EA groups at a 10% false discovery rate

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Oral microbiota of African American children (AA)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Streptococcus

Revision editor(s): Kaluifeanyi101, Folakunmi

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-1-30

Curated date: 2022/06/29

Curator: Kaluifeanyi101

Revision editor(s): Kaluifeanyi101, Folakunmi

Source: Figure 2C

Description: Genus-level differentially abundant taxa in the oral microbiota comparison between AA and EA groups at a 10% false discovery rate

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Oral microbiota of African American children (AA)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Butyrivibrio
Capnocytophaga
Fusobacterium
Haemophilus
Prevotella

Revision editor(s): Kaluifeanyi101, Folakunmi