The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients/Experiment 3

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/08/24

Curated date: 2022/08/24

Curator: Fatima

Revision editor(s): Fatima, Sharmilac

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Mus musculus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Response to immunochemotherapy Response to immunochemotherapy,response to immunochemotherapy
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Non-responders, group B
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Responders, group A
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Mouse with 16.SIY melanoma tumor growth
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
3
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
3

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
RT-qPCR

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/08/24

Curated date: 2022/08/24

Curator: Fatima

Revision editor(s): Fatima

Source: Figure 3

Description: Relative abundance in mouse groups A and b of key species validated for quantitative PCR

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Responders, group A

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Collinsella aerofaciens
Bifidobacterium longum
Lactobacillus sp.
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Parabacteroides merdae

Revision editor(s): Fatima

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2022/08/24

Curated date: 2022/08/24

Curator: Fatima

Revision editor(s): Fatima

Source: Figure 3

Description: Relative abundance in mouse groups A an B of key species validated for quantitative PCR scoring.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Responders, group A

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Roseburia intestinalis

Revision editor(s): Fatima