Differential Analysis of Gut Microbiota Correlated With Oxidative Stress in Sows With High or Low Litter Performance During Lactation

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Wang H, Ji Y, Yin C, Deng M, Tang T, Deng B, Ren W, Deng J, Yin Y, Tan C
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
Year
2018
Keywords:
gut microbiota, lactation, litter performance, oxidative stress, sows
It has been suggested that gut microbiota play a critical role in maternal metabolic oxidative stress responses and offspring growth. However, whether the gut microbiota and oxidative stress status of the sows affect the litter performance during lactation is unclear. A total of 66 Yorkshire sows were identified as high (H) or low (L) litter performance sows based on litter weight at day 21 of lactation. Ten sows per group with similar parity, backfat thickness, and litter weight after cross-foster from the H or L group were collected randomly to analyze the oxidative stress and gut microbiota during lactation. The result showed that the serum total antioxidant capacity was higher in the H group, while 8-hydroxy-deoxyguanosine and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were lower in the H group at farrowing. Four distinct clusters of bacteria were related to litter performance and reproductive periods of sows. Twelve differentially abundant taxa during gestation and 13 taxa during lactation were identified as potential biomarkers between the H group and the L group. Moreover, the litter performance and the antioxidant capacity of sows were positively correlated with Bacteroides_f__Bacteroidaceae but negatively with Phascolarctobacterium and Streptococcus. In conclusion, this study found that gut microbiota and oxidative stress were significantly correlated with the litter performance of sows during lactation.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/03/09

Curator: Blessingpeters

Revision editor(s): Blessingpeters, Scholastica

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Sus scrofa domesticus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Gut microbiome measurement Gut microbiome measurement,gut microbiome measurement
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
High litter performance sows at G109
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Low litter performance sows at G109
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Low litter performance sows group at day 109 of gestation
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
10
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
10
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
None

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
3

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
increased
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
decreased
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/14

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Figure 4B

Description: Differences in fecal microbiota in day 109 of gestation of high litter performance sows compared to day 109 of gestation of low litter performance sows

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Low litter performance sows at G109

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Candidatus Tariuqbacterales
Cyanobacteriota
Phascolarctobacterium
Turicibacter
Turicibacteraceae
Veillonellaceae
o_YS2o_YS2
c_4C0d_2c_4C0d_2
f_norank_o_YS2f_norank_o_YS2
g_norank_o_YS2g_norank_o_YS2

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/14

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Figure 4B

Description: Differences in fecal microbiota in day 109 of gestation of high litter performance sows compared to day 109 of gestation of low litter performance sows

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Low litter performance sows at G109

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroidaceae
Bacteroides

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Experiment 2


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/14

Curator: Blessingpeters

Revision editor(s): Blessingpeters, Scholastica

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
High litter performance sows at L21
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Low litter performance sows at L21
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Low litter performance sows group at day 21 of lactation (L21)

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
increased
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
decreased
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/15

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Figure 4E

Description: Differences in fecal microbiota in day 21 of lactation of high litter performance sows compared to day 21 of lactation of low litter performance sows

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Low litter performance sows at L21

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Clostridia
Eubacteriales

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/15

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Figure 4E

Description: Differences in fecal microbiota in day 21 of lactation of high litter performance sows compared to day 21 of lactation of low litter performance sows

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Low litter performance sows at L21

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Coprococcus
Mollicutes
Mycoplasmatota
Parabacteroides
Porphyromonadaceae
unclassified Mollicutes
o_RF39o_RF39
f_norank_o_RF39f_norank_o_RF39
g_norank_o_RF39g_norank_o_RF39

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Experiment 3


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/14

Curator: Blessingpeters

Revision editor(s): Blessingpeters, Scholastica

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Day 109 of gestation (G109) of H group
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Day 21 of lactation (L21) of H group
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Day 21 of lactation (L21) of high litter performance sows group

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/14

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Figure 4H

Description: Differences in fecal microbiota in day 109 of gestation (G109) compared to day 21 of lactation (L21) of high litter performance sows

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Day 21 of lactation (L21) of H group

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Lactobacillaceae
Mollicutes
Mycoplasmatota
Parabacteroides
Porphyromonadaceae
Ruminococcus
unclassified Mogibacterium
RF39RF39
f_norank_o_RF39f_norank_o_RF39
g_norank_o_RF39g_norank_o_RF39
g_norank_f_WCHB1_25g_norank_f_WCHB1_25
f_WCHB1_25f_WCHB1_25
g_norank_f_Leuconostocaceaeg_norank_f_Leuconostocaceae
CF231CF231

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/14

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Figure 4H

Description: Differences in fecal microbiota in day 109 of gestation (G109) compared to day 21 of lactation (L21) of high litter performance sows

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Day 21 of lactation (L21) of H group

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Aeromonadales
Bacteroidaceae
Bacteroides
Gammaproteobacteria
Nocardioidaceae
Propionicimonas
Pseudomonadota
Succinivibrio
Succinivibrionaceae
unclassified Coriobacteriaceae
unclassified Helicobacteraceae
f_norank_c_TM7_3f_norank_c_TM7_3
o_norank_c_TM7_3o_norank_c_TM7_3
g_norank_c_TM7_3g_norank_c_TM7_3
g_L7A_E11g_L7A_E11

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Experiment 4


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/14

Curator: Blessingpeters

Revision editor(s): Blessingpeters, Scholastica

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Day 109 of gestation (G109) of L group
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Day 21 of lactation (L21) of L group
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Day 21 of lactation (L21) of low litter performance sows group

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
unchanged
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-15

Curated date: 2024/04/14

Curator: Scholastica

Revision editor(s): Scholastica

Source: Figure 4K

Description: Differences in fecal microbiota in day 109 of gestation (G109) compared to day 21 of lactation (L21) of low litter performance sows

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Day 21 of lactation (L21) of L group

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Cyanobacteriota
Enterobacterales
Enterobacteriaceae
Gammaproteobacteria
Lachnospiraceae
Nocardioidaceae
Phascolarctobacterium
Propionicimonas
Pseudomonadota
Streptophyta
Veillonellaceae
unclassified Lachnospiraceae
g_norank_f_Rs_045g_norank_f_Rs_045
f_norank_o_streptophytaf_norank_o_streptophyta
g_norank_o_streptophytag_norank_o_streptophyta
c_4C0d_2c_4C0d_2
f_norank_o_YS2f_norank_o_YS2
g_norank_o_YS2g_norank_o_YS2
o_YS2o_YS2
f_Rs_045f_Rs_045
o_I025o_I025

Revision editor(s): Scholastica