Characterization of the Gut Microbial Community of Obese Patients Following a Weight-Loss Intervention Using Whole Metagenome Shotgun Sequencing

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Louis S, Tappu RM, Damms-Machado A, Huson DH, Bischoff SC
Journal
PloS one
Year
2016
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Cross-sectional studies suggested that obesity is promoted by the gut microbiota. However, longitudinal data on taxonomic and functional changes in the gut microbiota of obese patients are scarce. The aim of this work is to study microbiota changes in the course of weight loss therapy and the following year in obese individuals with or without co-morbidities, and to asses a possible predictive value of the gut microbiota with regard to weight loss maintenance. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Sixteen adult patients, who followed a 52-week weight-loss program comprising low calorie diet, exercise and behavioral therapy, were selected according to their weight-loss course. Over two years, anthropometric and metabolic parameters were assessed and microbiota from stool samples was functionally and taxonomically analyzed using DNA shotgun sequencing. RESULTS: Overall the microbiota responded to the dietetic and lifestyle intervention but tended to return to the initial situation both at the taxonomical and functional level at the end of the intervention after one year, except for an increase in Akkermansia abundance which remained stable over two years (12.7x103 counts, 95%CI: 322-25100 at month 0; 141x103 counts, 95%CI: 49-233x103 at month 24; p = 0.005). The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was higher in obese subjects with metabolic syndrome (0.64, 95%CI: 0.34-0.95) than in the "healthy obese" (0.27, 95%CI: 0.08-0.45, p = 0.04). Participants, who succeeded in losing their weight consistently over the two years, had at baseline a microbiota enriched in Alistipes, Pseudoflavonifractor and enzymes of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway compared to patients who were less successful in weight reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Successful weight reduction in the obese is accompanied with increased Akkermansia numbers in feces. Metabolic co-morbidities are associated with a higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. Most interestingly, microbiota differences might allow discrimination between successful and unsuccessful weight loss prior to intervention.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Victoria

Subjects

Location of subjects
Germany
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Obesity Adiposis,Adiposity,Obese,Obese (finding),obesity,Obesity (disorder),Obesity [Ambiguous],obesity disease,obesity disorder,Obesity NOS,Obesity, unspecified,Overweight and obesity,Obesity
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
baseline participants
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
3 months
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
A threshold of 10% weight loss and maintenance of it over one year has been proposed as definition for successful weight loss maintenance
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
16
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
16
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2021/08/7

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Marianthi Thomatos

Revision editor(s): Fatima, WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3

Description: Gut microbial community of obese patients following weight-loss intervention

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in 3 months

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens
Collinsella aerofaciens
Parasutterella excrementihominis
Roseburia intestinalis
Roseburia inulinivorans
Subdoligranulum variabile
Burkholderiales bacterium 1_1_47

Revision editor(s): Fatima, WikiWorks

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Marianthi Thomatos

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3

Description: Gut microbial community of obese patients following weight-loss intervention

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in 3 months

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Treponema brennaborense
Pedobacter heparinus
Alistipes finegoldii
Dysgonomonas gadei
Desulfitobacterium hafniense
Desulforamulus ruminis
Selenomonas sputigena
Anaerotruncus colihominis
Ethanoligenens harbinense
Oscillibacter valericigenes
Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus
Holdemania filiformis
Heyndrickxia coagulans
Enterococcus faecalis
Enterococcus faecium
Paenibacillus mucilaginosus
Clostridioides difficile
Enterocloster asparagiformis
Marvinbryantia formatexigens
Geobacter sp. M18
Escherichia coli
Stutzerimonas stutzeri
Streptomyces coelicolor
Slackia heliotrinireducens
Eggerthella lenta
Akkermansia muciniphila
Thermanaerovibrio acidaminovorans
Fretibacterium fastidiosum

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Experiment 2


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Victoria

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
3 months participants
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
6 months

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Marianthi Thomatos

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3

Description: Gut microbial community of obese patients following weight-loss intervention

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in 6 months

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Alistipes finegoldii
Dysgonomonas gadei
Enterocloster asparagiformis
Lacrimispora saccharolytica
Desulfovibrio desulfuricans
Escherichia coli
Eggerthella lenta
Gordonibacter pamelaeae
Thermanaerovibrio acidaminovorans

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Fatima on 2021/08/7

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Marianthi Thomatos

Revision editor(s): Fatima, WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3

Description: Gut microbial community of obese patients following weight-loss intervention

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in 6 months

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens
Lactococcus lactis
Micavibrio aeruginosavorus
Parasutterella excrementihominis
Roseburia inulinivorans
Streptococcus thermophilus
Veillonella parvula
Burkholderiales bacterium 1_1_47

Revision editor(s): Fatima, WikiWorks

Experiment 3


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks, Victoria

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
6 months participants
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
24 months

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Marianthi Thomatos

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3

Description: Gut microbial community of obese patients following weight-loss intervention

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in 24 months

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Pedobacter heparinus

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Marianthi Thomatos

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Figure 3

Description: Gut microbial community of obese patients following weight-loss intervention

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in 24 months

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Akkermansia muciniphila
Escherichia coli
Collinsella aerofaciens

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks