Characteristics of gut microbiota in patients with asthenozoospermia: a Chinese pilot study

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-4-1
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Li Liu, Shangren Wang, Xiaoqiang Liu, Yang Pan
Journal
BMC microbiology
Year
2024
Pages:
First page:
Keywords:
16s rrna, Asthenozoospermia, Semen quality, dysbiosis, gut microbiota
Asthenozoospermia (AS) is one of the most frequent reasons for infertile men. It is characterized by a reduced sperm progressive motility to < 32%. AS is usually identified as an isolated illness or as one aspect of other semen anomalies [1]. The etiologies of AS are complex and varied, such as inflammation, immune defects, irregular lifestyles, and genetics [2].

Gut microbiota could play a role in human immune and causative agent resistance [3, 4]. Gut microbiota dysbiosis is usually associated with an abnormality in microbial diversity, resulting in inflammation and autoimmune diseases [5, 6]. Moreover, intestinal flora participates in the regulation of inflammatory and immune protection in many organs such as the brain and testes [7, 8].

Gut microbiota dysbiosis could affect the integrity of the blood-testis barrier (BTB), eventually impairing testicular spermatogenic processes by potential mechanisms below. On one hand, the testes usually cannot synthesize nutrients themselves. Blood vessels in the testes transport nutrients, including those synthesized or metabolized by the gut microbiota, from the digestive system to the testicular interstitium. These nutrients, such as vitamins and minerals, are vital for normal testicular function [9]. Gut microbiota dysbiosis may disturb the original nutritional structure and subsequently affect testicular function [10]. On the other hand, gut microbiota dysbiosis may result in a chronic inflammatory status and excessive immunological response that disrupts the spermatogenic processes in the testes [11]. For example, gut microbiota dysbiosis could cause abnormal intestinal permeability and increase lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels in the blood. The increased LPS can induce innate immunity and activate testicular LPS/TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathways [12]. This process can induce testicular endothelial injury and damage the BTB, eventually impairing spermatogenesis.

Identifying intestinal flora composition is significant for understanding the causes and pathogenic mechanism of the gut-testis axis and clarifying the relationship between the microflora and infertility. There are few reports on specifically investigating the gut microbiota characteristics in isolated AS patients. Hence, our study aimed to examine the microbiota characteristics in the gut of AS patients and discover the potentially key gut microbiota associated with the development of AS.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-4-1

Curated date: 2024/03/09

Curator: Eve10111

Revision editor(s): Eve10111, Folakunmi

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Abnormal sperm morphology Abnormal shape of sperm,Teratospermia,Teratozoospermia,Abnormal sperm morphology,abnormal sperm morphology
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy Control
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Asthenozoospermia
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Patients with reduced sperm mortility
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
60
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
48
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
3

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
decreased
Richness Number of species
decreased
Faith Phylogenetic diversity, takes into account phylogenetic distance of all taxa identified in a sample
decreased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-4-1

Curated date: 2024/03/10

Curator: Eve10111

Revision editor(s): Eve10111, Folakunmi

Source: Figure 5B

Description: The differentially expressed gut microbiota identified by LEfSe analysis

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Asthenozoospermia

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Acidaminococcaceae
Acidaminococcales
Aggregatibacter
Alloprevotella
Azospirillum
Bacteroides fragilis
Bifidobacterium longum
Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum
Burkholderiales
Citrobacter freundii
Desulfovibrio
Desulfovibrionaceae
Desulfovibrionales
Desulfovibrionia
Enterobacterales
Enterobacteriaceae
Erysipelotrichaceae
Escherichia/Shigella sp.
Gammaproteobacteria
Holdemania
Lactobacillaceae
Lactobacillus
Ligilactobacillus salivarius
Muribaculaceae
Parasutterella
Pasteurellaceae
Phascolarctobacterium
Phascolarctobacterium faecium
Pseudomonadota
Streptococcus mitis
Sutterellaceae
Thermodesulfobacteriota
unclassified Erysipelotrichaceae

Revision editor(s): Eve10111, Folakunmi

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Folakunmi on 2024-4-1

Curated date: 2024/03/10

Curator: Eve10111

Revision editor(s): Eve10111, Folakunmi

Source: Figure 5B

Description: The differentially expressed gut microbiota identified by LEfSe analysis

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Asthenozoospermia

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Acidobacteriota
Alphaproteobacteria
Bacillota
Erysipelotrichaceae
Hyphomicrobiales
Nocardioidaceae
Phocaeicola coprophilus
Prevotella sp.
Propionibacteriales
Thermoleophilia
Verrucomicrobiota
unclassified Prevotellaceae

Revision editor(s): Eve10111, Folakunmi