Progression of Parkinson's disease is associated with gut dysbiosis: Two-year follow-up study/Experiment 3
From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-31
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- Japan
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Homo sapiens
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Timepoint Timepoint,timepoint
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- Deteriorated Group at year 0
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- Deteriorated Group at year 2
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- The Deteriorated Group is the group of patients with significantly higher UPDRS(United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) score at year 2
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 18
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 11
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- PCR
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- Not specified
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- RT-qPCR
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- Yes
Signature 1
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-7-31
Source: Table 2 & supplementary Table 2
Description: Difference of bacterial counts between years 0 and 2 in the Deteriorated group.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Deteriorated Group at year 2
| NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | ||
| Lactobacillus gasseri subgroupLactobacillus gasseri subgroup |
Revision editor(s): Idiaru angela
