Differential composition of gut microbiota among healthy volunteers, morbidly obese patients and post-bariatric surgery patients

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Wang FG, Bai RX, Yan WM, Yan M, Dong LY, Song MM
Journal
Experimental and therapeutic medicine
Year
2019
Keywords:
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, bariatric surgery, gut microbiota, morbid obesity, sleeve gastrectomy, type 2 diabetes mellitus
The modulation of the gut microbiota was recently deemed one of the mechanisms responsible for the excellent outcomes of bariatric surgery. However, to date, only few studies have assessed this, and they have high heterogeneity. In the present study, next-generation 16S ribosomal DNA amplicon sequencing was used to characterize the gut microbiota of healthy volunteers, as well as patients prior to and after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Significant differences in α diversity, β diversity and species were identified between the different groups/time-points. The results demonstrated excellent outcomes of SG and RYGB. The β diversity was lower in healthy volunteers compared with that in morbidly obese patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus. At 3 months after SG, the α diversity was increased and the β diversity was decreased. The abundance of certain species changed significantly after SG and RYGB. It was also revealed that the abundance of certain microbes was significantly correlated with the body mass index, fasting blood glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin. It may be concluded that bariatric surgery may cause obvious alterations in the gut microbiota and compared with healthy volunteers and obese patients without bariatric surgery, the microbiota composition of post-bariatric surgery has unique characteristics. However, studies with a larger cohort and longer follow-up may be required to confirm these results.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Obesity Adiposis,Adiposity,Obese,Obese (finding),obesity,Obesity (disorder),Obesity [Ambiguous],obesity disease,obesity disorder,Obesity NOS,Obesity, unspecified,Overweight and obesity,Obesity
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
healthy controls
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
obese patients prior to Sleeve gastrectomy SG0
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
obese patients had a body mass index (BMI) of >28 kg/m2.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
20
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
19
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Ion Torrent

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
Kruskall-Wallis
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
4
Matched on Factors on which subjects have been matched on in a case-control study
age, sex

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Marianthi Thomatos

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Table 3

Description: Differential composition of gut microbiota among healthy volunteers and morbidly obese patients before recieving sleeve gastrectomy

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in obese patients prior to Sleeve gastrectomy SG0

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Clostridia
Eubacteriales
Oscillospiraceae
Fusobacterium mortiferum
Peptostreptococcaceae

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Experiment 2


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
7

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Table 3

Description: Differential composition of gut microbiota among healthy volunteers and morbidly obese patients before recieving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bifidobacteriales
Bifidobacteriaceae
Bifidobacterium
Peptostreptococcaceae
Megasphaera

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Experiment 3


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
obese patients prior to Sleeve gastrectomy SG0
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
obese patients three months after Sleeve gastrectomy SG3
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
19
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
8

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
increased
Richness Number of species
increased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Table 3

Description: Differential composition of gut microbiota among healthy volunteers and morbidly obese patients before recieving sleeve gastrectomy

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in obese patients three months after Sleeve gastrectomy SG3

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacilli
Lactobacillales
Streptococcaceae
Rikenellaceae
Alistipes
Streptococcus
Streptococcus thermophilus
Porphyromonadaceae
Alistipes finegoldii

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Experiment 4


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: WikiWorks

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
patients prior to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RYGB0
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
obese patients 3 moths after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RYGB3
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
7
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
3

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Table 3

Description: Differential composition of gut microbiota among healthy volunteers and morbidly obese patients before recieving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in obese patients 3 moths after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RYGB3

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Negativicutes
Selenomonadales
Faecalibacterium

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Shaimaa Elsafoury on 2021/02/09

Curated date: 2021/01/10

Curator: Shaimaa Elsafoury

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks

Source: Table 3

Description: Differential composition of gut microbiota among healthy volunteers and morbidly obese patients before recieving Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in obese patients 3 moths after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RYGB3

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacilli
Lactobacillales
Streptococcaceae
Streptococcus
Streptococcus thermophilus

Revision editor(s): WikiWorks