Impact of sugar beet pulp and wheat bran on serum biochemical profile, inflammatory responses and gut microbiota in sows during late gestation and lactation/Experiment 2

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-4-28

Curated date: 2025/04/15

Curator: Anne-mariesharp

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Sus scrofa domesticus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Diet Dietary,Diets,Diet,diet
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
CON (Control) diet during lactation
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
SBP (Sugar Beet Pulp) diet during lactation
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
The Sows in this group were fed a 10% Sugar beet pulp diet during lactation
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
5
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
5

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Kruskall-Wallis
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-4-28

Curated date: 2025/04/15

Curator: Anne-mariesharp

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp

Source: Fig. 10B

Description: Relative abundance of significantly different taxon on day21 of lactation between Control diet (CON) & SBP (sugar beet pulp diet)

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in SBP (Sugar Beet Pulp) diet during lactation

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
unclassified Lachnospiraceae

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-4-28

Curated date: 2025/04/15

Curator: Anne-mariesharp

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp

Source: Fig. 10B

Description: Relative abundance of significantly different taxon on day21 of lactation between Control diet (CON) & SBP (sugar beet pulp diet)

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in SBP (Sugar Beet Pulp) diet during lactation

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Lactobacillus

Revision editor(s): Anne-mariesharp