Unveiling the microbiome during post-partum uterine infection: a deep shotgun sequencing approach to characterize the dairy cow uterine microbiome

From BugSigDB
Needs review
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Basbas C, Garzon A, Schlesener C, van Heule M, Profeta R, Weimer BC, Silva-Del-Rio N, Byrne BA, Karle B, Aly SS, Lima FS, Pereira RV
Journal
Animal microbiome
Year
2023
Keywords:
Diversity, Metritis, Microbiota, Uterine microbiome
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to assess the microbial ecology and diversity present in the uterus of post-partum dairy cows with and without metritis from 24 commercial California dairy farms using shotgun metagenomics. A set subset of 95 intrauterine swab samples, taken from a larger selection of 307 individual cow samples previously collected, were examined for α and β diversity and differential abundance associated with metritis. Cows within 21 days post-partum were categorized into one of three clinical groups during sample collection: control (CT, n = 32), defined as cows with either no vaginal discharge or a clear, non-purulent mucus vaginal discharge; metritis (MET, n = 33), defined as a cow with watery, red or brown colored, and fetid vaginal discharge; and purulent discharge cows (PUS, n = 31), defined as a non-fetid purulent or mucopurulent vaginal discharge. RESULTS: All three clinical groups (CT, MET, and PUS) were highly diverse, with the top 12 most abundant genera accounting for 10.3%, 8.8%, and 10.1% of mean relative abundance, respectively. The α diversity indices revealed a lower diversity from samples collected from MET and PUS when compared to CT cows. PERMANOVA statistical testing revealed a significant difference (P adjusted < 0.01) in the diversity of genera between CT and MET samples (R2 = 0.112, P = 0.003) and a non-significant difference between MET and PUS samples (R2 = 0.036, P = 0.046). ANCOM-BC analysis revealed that from the top 12 most abundant genera, seven genera were increased in the natural log fold change (LFC) of abundance in MET when compared to CT samples: Bacteroides, Clostridium, Fusobacterium, Phocaeicola, Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Streptococcus. Two genera, Dietzia and Microbacterium, were decreased in natural LFC of abundance when comparing MET (regardless of treatment) and CT, while no changes in natural LFC of abundance were observed for Escherichia, Histophilus, and Trueperella. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented here, are the current deepest shotgun metagenomic analyses conducted on the bovine uterine microbiome to date (mean of 256,425 genus-level reads per sample). Our findings support that uterine samples from cows without metritis (CT) had increased α-diversity but decreased β-diversity when compared to metritis or PUS cows, characteristic of dysbiosis. In summary, our findings highlight that MET cows have an increased abundance of Bacteroides, Porphyromonas, and Fusobacterium when compared to CT and PUS, and support the need for further studies to better understand their potential causal role in metritis pathogenesis.

Experiment 1


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/23

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Bos taurus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Endometrial cavity Cavity of body of uterus,Endometrial cavity,Endometrial lumen,Intrauterine cavity,endometrial cavity
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Uterine inflammatory disease inflammatory disease of the uterus,uterine inflammatory disease,Uterine inflammatory disease
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Control group (CT)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Metritis group (MET)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Cows with Metritis typically occurring within 21 days post-partum, characterized by an enlarged uterus, fever, and fetid, watery red-brown uterine discharge.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
32
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
33

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
log transformation
Statistical test
ANCOM-BC
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased
Chao1 Abundance-based estimator of species richness
increased
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/23

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Table 1

Description: Most abundant genera for Metritis (MET regardless of antimicrobial treatment) vs. Control (CT)

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Metritis group (MET)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacteroides
Clostridium
Fusobacterium
Phocaeicola
Porphyromonas
Prevotella
Streptococcus

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/23

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Table 1

Description: Most abundant genera for Metritis (MET regardless of antimicrobial treatment) vs. Control (CT)

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Metritis group (MET)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Dietzia
Microbacterium

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Experiment 2


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/23

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Metritis group (MET_treatment)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Cows with metritis that had received individual antimicrobial treatment in the last 14 days prior to sampling.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
9

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/23

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 4 and 5

Description: Heatmap of natural log fold changes in abundance of the phyla and genera with an adjusted p<0.05 for MET_Treatment when compared to control.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Metritis group (MET_treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Synergistota
Thermotogae
Verrucomicrobiota
Spirochaetia
Planctomycetota
Ignavibacteriota
Gemmatimonadota
Deferribacterota
Cyanobacteriota
Chlamydiota
Chlorobiota
Bacteroidota
Aquificota
Acidobacteriota
Liquorilactobacillus
Cyclobacterium
Owenweeksia
Anoxybacter
Flavihumibacter
Dyadobacter
Oceanobacillus

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/23

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 4 and 5

Description: Heatmap of natural log fold changes in abundance of the phyla and genera with an adjusted p<0.05 for MET_Treatment when compared to control.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Metritis group (MET_treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Rathayibacter
Glutamicibacter
Pseudonocardia
Mycoplasmatota
Kiritimatiellota
Evosea
Euglenozoa
Elusimicrobia
Thermoplasmatota
Basidiomycota
Balneolota
Bacillariophyta
Ascomycota
Apicomplexa
Actinomycetota

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Experiment 3


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Clinical treatment Clinical treatment,clinical treatment
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Metritis group (MET_no treatment)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Cows with metritis that had not received individual antimicrobial treatment in the last 14 days prior to sampling.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
25

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 4 and 5

Description: Heatmap of natural log fold changes in abundance of the phyla and genera with an adjusted p<0.05 for MET_no Treatment when compared to control.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Metritis group (MET_no treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Ignavibacteriota
Gemmatimonadota
Deferribacterota
Chlorobiota
Chlamydiota
Bacteroidota
Aquificota
Liquorilactobacillus
Cyclobacterium
Owenweeksia
Flavihumibacter
Anoxybacter
Dyadobacter
Oceanobacillus

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 4 and 5

Description: Heatmap of natural log fold changes in abundance of the phyla and genera with an adjusted p<0.05 for MET_no Treatment when compared to control.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Metritis group (MET_no treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Rathayibacter
Glutamicibacter
Pseudonocardia
Actinomycetota

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Experiment 4


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Uterine inflammatory disease inflammatory disease of the uterus,uterine inflammatory disease,Uterine inflammatory disease
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Pus Cows
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Cows with purulent discharge (PUS); defined as a non-fetid purulent or mucopurulent vaginal discharge.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
31

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased
Simpson Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species evenness
decreased

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 4 and 5

Description: Heatmap of natural log fold changes in abundance of the phyla and genera with an adjusted p<0.05 for Pus when compared to control.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Pus Cows

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Gemmatimonadota
Chlorobiota
Chlamydiota
Bacteroidota
Liquorilactobacillus
Cyclobacterium
Owenweeksia
Anoxybacter
Flavihumibacter
Dyadobacter
Oceanobacillus

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 4 and 5

Description: Heatmap of natural log fold changes in abundance of the phyla and genera with an adjusted p<0.05 for Pus when compared to control.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Pus Cows

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Rathayibacter
Pseudonocardia
Glutamicibacter
Actinomycetota

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Experiment 5


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Clinical treatment Clinical treatment,clinical treatment
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Metritis group (MET_treatment)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Clinical group comparison of metritis or uterine health by other studies for Cows with metritis that had received individual antimicrobial treatment in the last 14 days prior to sampling.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
9

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 3

Description: ANCOM-BC heatmap of natural log fold changes of genera abundance for MET_Treatment vs Control (CT) compared to genera from other studies.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Metritis group (MET_treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Streptobacillus
Salmonella
Peptoniphilus
Pedobacter
Helicobacter
Filifactor
Cryptococcus
Citrobacter
Arcanobacterium
Anaerococcus

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 3

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/25

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 3

Description: ANCOM-BC heatmap of natural log fold changes of genera abundance for MET_Treatment vs Control (CT) compared to genera from other studies.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Metritis group (MET_treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Trueperella
Streptomyces
Streptococcus
Staphylococcus
Ruminococcus
Prevotella
Mycobacterium
Micrococcus
Klebsiella
Histophilus
Escherichia
Corynebacterium
Brucella
Brevibacterium
Bifidobacterium
Bacteroides
Bacillus

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Experiment 6


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/24

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Metritis group (MET_no treatment)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Clinical group comparison of metritis or uterine health by other studies for Cows with metritis that had not received individual antimicrobial treatment in the last 14 days prior to sampling.
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
25

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/25

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 3

Description: ANCOM-BC heatmap of natural log fold changes of genera abundance for MET_no Treatment vs Control (CT) compared to genera from other studies.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Metritis group (MET_no treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Streptobacillus
Filifactor
Citrobacter
Chlamydia

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/02/25

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 3

Description: ANCOM-BC heatmap of natural log fold changes of genera abundance for MET_no Treatment vs Control (CT) compared to genera from other studies.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Metritis group (MET_no treatment)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Streptomyces
Micrococcus
Corynebacterium
Brucella
Brevibacterium
Bifidobacterium

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA