Oral microbiome dysbiosis among cigarette smokers and smokeless tobacco users compared to non-users/Experiment 11

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-7-31

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, Victoria, Tosin

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Saliva Sailva normalis,Saliva atomaris,Saliva molecularis,Salivary gland secretion,Saliva,saliva
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Smoking behaviour measurement Smoking behaviour measurement,smoking behaviour measurement
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco users at time 1 (ST)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco users at time 4 (ST)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Participants who had used tobacco at least once per week for the previous year at time point 4.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
43
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
18
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Kruskall-Wallis
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-7-31

Curated date: 2025/04/30

Curator: Shulamite

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, Victoria

Source: Figure 2b

Description: Differential abundance of bacterial OTUs in saliva samples that were statistically significantly different (α = 0.001) between time-points 1 and 4. The OTUs are colored by user groups (cigarette user (CG), orange; smokeless tobacco user (ST), green; non-user (NU), grey). A positive log2-fold change value denotes an OTU that is significantly higher in time-point 1 samples, while a negative log2-fold change indicates an OTU that is significantly higher in time-point 4 samples.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users at time 4 (ST)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
unclassified Mycoplasmataceae

Revision editor(s): Shulamite, Victoria