Oral microbiome dysbiosis among cigarette smokers and smokeless tobacco users compared to non-users/Experiment 14

From BugSigDB


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-7-31

Curated date: 2025/07/28

Curator: Victoria

Revision editor(s): Victoria, Tosin

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Saliva , Buccal mucosa Sailva normalis,Saliva atomaris,Saliva molecularis,Salivary gland secretion,Saliva,saliva,Buccal mucosa,buccal mucosa
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Specimen Specimen,specimen
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco users (ST - Buccal)
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Smokeless tobacco users (ST - Saliva)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Saliva samples of participants who had used tobacco at least once per week for the previous year.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
18
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
18
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V3-V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Kruskall-Wallis
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No


Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-7-31

Curated date: 2025/07/30

Curator: Victoria

Revision editor(s): Victoria

Source: Supplementary Figure 9

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by sample type (buccal swab (red), saliva (blue) across each user group: cigarette users (CG), smokeless tobacco users (ST), and non-users (NU).

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST - Saliva)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Actinomyces
Fusobacterium
Leptotrichia
Neisseria
Oribacterium
Streptococcus

Revision editor(s): Victoria

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by KateRasheed on 2025-7-31

Curated date: 2025/07/30

Curator: Victoria

Revision editor(s): Victoria

Source: Supplementary Figure 9

Description: Box plots of relative abundance of the top 14 bacterial genera by sample type (buccal swab (red), saliva (blue) across each user group: cigarette users (CG), smokeless tobacco users (ST), and non-users (NU).

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Smokeless tobacco users (ST - Saliva)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Granulicatella
Lactobacillus
Pseudomonas

Revision editor(s): Victoria