The impact of regular sauerkraut consumption on the human gut microbiota: a crossover intervention trial/Experiment 7

From BugSigDB


Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/04

Curator: Taofeecoh

Revision editor(s): Taofeecoh

Subjects

Location of subjects
Germany
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Health study participation health questionnaire participation,health survey participation,Health study participation,health study participation
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Fiber intake Strata for Pasteurized Sauerkraut Intervention: Fiber ≥ 30g
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Fiber intake Strata for Pasteurized Sauerkraut Intervention: Fiber < 30g
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Participants with < 30g fiber diet that received Pasteurized Sauerkraut Intervention.
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
3 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
WMS
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
Linear Regression
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.1
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
Yes

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
unchanged
Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Inverse Simpson Modification of Simpsons index D as 1/D to obtain high values in datasets of high diversity and vice versa
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2025/03/04

Curator: Taofeecoh

Revision editor(s): Taofeecoh

Source: Supplementary Figure S11

Description: Species’ relative abundance following stratification by fiber intake

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Fiber intake Strata for Pasteurized Sauerkraut Intervention: Fiber < 30g

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Anaerobutyricum hallii
Anaerostipes hadrus

Revision editor(s): Taofeecoh