White-nose syndrome restructures bat skin microbiomes

From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-6-25
study design
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Ange-Stark M, Parise KL, Cheng TL, Hoyt JR, Langwig KE, Frick WF, Kilpatrick AM, Gillece J, MacManes MD, Foster JT
Journal
Microbiology spectrum
Year
2023
Keywords:
Eptesicus fuscus, Myotis lucifugus, Perimyotis subflavus, Pseudogymnoascus destructans, bat populations, disease ecology, microbiome, white-nose syndrome
Inherent complexities in the composition of microbiomes can often preclude investigations of microbe-associated diseases. Instead of single organisms being associated with disease, community characteristics may be more relevant. Longitudinal microbiome studies of the same individual bats as pathogens arrive and infect a population are the ideal experiment but remain logistically challenging; therefore, investigations like our approach that are able to correlate invasive pathogens to alterations within a microbiome may be the next best alternative. The results of this study potentially suggest that microbiome-host interactions may determine the likelihood of infection. However, the contrasting relationship between Pd and the bacterial microbiomes of Myotis lucifugus and Perimyotis subflavus indicate that we are just beginning to understand how the bat microbiome interacts with a fungal invader such as Pd.

Experiment 1


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-6-25

Curated date: 2024/03/21

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Subjects

Location of subjects
United States of America
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Myotis lucifugus
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Skin epidermis Epidermis,Skin,Vertebrate epidermis,Skin epidermis,skin epidermis
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Fungal infectious disease fungal infection,Fungi caused disease or disorder,Fungi disease or disorder,Fungi infection,Fungi infectious disease,infection, fungal,infections, Fungi,mycoses,mycosis,Fungal infectious disease,fungal infectious disease
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Pseudogymnoascus Destructans (PD) Negative
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Pseudogymnoascus Destructans (PD) positive
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Myotis lucifugus Bats species infected with Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd).
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
29
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
81

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
2

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
decreased
Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
decreased
Richness Number of species
decreased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-6-25

Curated date: 2024/03/21

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Results Text and Fig 4

Description: Taxonomic differential abundance analyses in Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd)-positive and Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd)-negative M. lucifugus.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Pseudogymnoascus Destructans (PD) positive

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Pseudonocardiaceae

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-6-25

Curated date: 2024/03/21

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Results Text and Fig 4

Description: Taxonomic differential abundance analyses in Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd)-positive and Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd)-negative M. lucifugus.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Pseudogymnoascus Destructans (PD) positive

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Brucellaceae
Chromatiales
Cytophagaceae
Rhizobiaceae

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Experiment 2


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-6-25

Curated date: 2024/03/21

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Perimyotis subflavus


Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Perimyotis subflavus Bats species infected with Pseudogymnoascus destructans (Pd).
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
43
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
95

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
ITS / ITS2
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
Not specified

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Pielou Quantifies how equal the community is numerically
increased
Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased
Richness Number of species
decreased

Experiment 3


Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-6-25

Curated date: 2024/03/21

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Myotis lucifugus


Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Batsskin swaps
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
Substrate (Environmental swaps)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
Substrate swab samples simultaneously collected from the ceiling or walls of each hibernaculum at least 10 cm from the bat species.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
154
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
70

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
increased

Signature 1

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-6-25

Curated date: 2024/03/21

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure S8

Description: Bacterial differential abundance between bat and substrate samples.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in Substrate (Environmental swaps)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Gaiellaceae
Hyphomicrobiaceae
Nitrospiraceae
Pseudonocardiaceae
Rhodospirillaceae
Sphingomonadaceae
Syntrophobacteraceae
Nevskiaceae
Gemmataceae
Methylocystaceae
Pirellulaceae
bacterium Ellin6075

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Signature 2

Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-6-25

Curated date: 2024/03/21

Curator: MyleeeA

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA

Source: Figure S8

Description: Bacterial differential abundance between bat and substrate samples.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in Substrate (Environmental swaps)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Pseudomonadaceae
Enterobacteriaceae
Micrococcaceae
Staphylococcaceae
Caryophanaceae
Carnobacteriaceae
Streptococcaceae

Revision editor(s): MyleeeA