Gut dysbiosis induces the development of depression-like behavior through abnormal synapse pruning in microglia-mediated by complement C3/Experiment 12
From BugSigDB
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-12-11
Subjects
- Location of subjects
- China
- Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
- Mus musculus
- Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
- Feces Cow dung,Cow pat,Droppings,Dung,Excrement,Excreta,Faeces,Fecal material,Fecal matter,Fewmet,Frass,Guano,Matières fécales@fr,Merde@fr,Ordure,Partie de la merde@fr,Piece of shit,Porción de mierda@es,Portion of dung,Portion of excrement,Portion of faeces,Portion of fecal material,Portion of fecal matter,Portion of feces,Portion of guano,Portion of scat,Portionem cacas,Scat,Spoor,Spraint,Stool,Teil der fäkalien@de,Feces,feces
- Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
- Response to antidepressant Response to antidepressant,response to antidepressant
- Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
- CUMS group
- Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
- CUMS + XYS group
- Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
- Mice group induced with chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) for 8 weeks, followed by daily oral administration of Xiaoyaosan (XYS).
- Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
- 6
- Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
- 6
Lab analysis
- Sequencing type
- 16S
- 16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
- V3-V4
- Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
- Illumina
Statistical Analysis
- Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
- relative abundances
- Statistical test
- Kruskall-Wallis
- Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
- 0.05
- MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
- No
Alpha Diversity
- Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
- increased
Signature 1
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-12-11
Source: Figure 4(G-I)
Description: The relative abundances of selected bacterial signatures in the control, CUMS, (CUMS + XYS) and (CUMS + FLX) groups.
Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in CUMS + XYS group
| NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
|---|---|---|
| Lactobacillus |
Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine
Signature 2
Reviewed Marked as Reviewed by Svetlana up on 2024-12-11
Source: Figure 4(G-I)
Description: The relative abundances of selected bacterial signatures in the control, CUMS, (CUMS + XYS) and (CUMS + FLX) groups.
Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in CUMS + XYS group
| NCBI | Quality Control | Links |
|---|---|---|
| Bacteroides | ||
| Klebsiella |
Revision editor(s): Aleru Divine
