Structural changes in the oral microbiome of the adolescent patients with moderate or severe dental fluorosis

From BugSigDB
Needs review
Citation
PMID PubMed identifier for scientific articles.
DOI Digital object identifier for electronic documents.
URI
Authors
Wang Q, Chen X, Hu H, Wei X, Wang X, Peng Z, Ma R, Zhao Q, Zhao J, Liu J, Deng F
Journal
Scientific reports
Year
2021
Dental fluorosis is a very prevalent endemic disease. Although oral microbiome has been reported to correlate with different oral diseases, there appears to be an absence of research recognizing any relationship between the severity of dental fluorosis and the oral microbiome. To this end, we investigated the changes in oral microbial community structure and identified bacterial species associated with moderate and severe dental fluorosis. Salivary samples of 42 individuals, assigned into Healthy (N = 9), Mild (N = 14) and Moderate/Severe (M&S, N = 19), were investigated using the V4 region of 16S rRNA gene. The oral microbial community structure based on Bray Curtis and Weighted Unifrac were significantly changed in the M&S group compared with both of Healthy and Mild. As the predominant phyla, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes showed variation in the relative abundance among groups. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was significantly higher in the M&S group. LEfSe analysis was used to identify differentially represented taxa at the species level. Several genera such as Streptococcus mitis, Gemella parahaemolysans, Lactococcus lactis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum, were significantly more abundant in patients with moderate/severe dental fluorosis, while Prevotella melaninogenica and Schaalia odontolytica were enriched in the Healthy group. In conclusion, our study indicates oral microbiome shift in patients with moderate/severe dental fluorosis. We identified several differentially represented bacterial species enriched in moderate and severe fluorosis. Findings from this study suggests that the roles of these bacteria in oral health and related diseases warrant more consideration in patients with moderate and severe fluorosis.

Experiment 1


Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/11

Curator: LiliGC

Revision editor(s): LiliGC, KateRasheed

Subjects

Location of subjects
China
Host species Species from which microbiome was sampled. Contact us to have more species added.
Homo sapiens
Body site Anatomical site where microbial samples were extracted from according to the Uber Anatomy Ontology
Saliva Sailva normalis,Saliva atomaris,Saliva molecularis,Salivary gland secretion,Saliva,saliva
Condition The experimental condition / phenotype studied according to the Experimental Factor Ontology
Dental fluorosis dental fluorosis,fluorosis,Fluorosis, Dental,Intrinsic enamel discolouration of fluorosis,intrinsic enamel discolouration of fluorosis,Mottled teeth,mottled teeth,Mottling of enamel,mottling of enamel,Dental fluorosis
Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Healthy
Group 1 name Corresponds to the case (exposed) group for case-control studies
M&S (Moderate/Severe)
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
This group includes participants diagnosed with dental fluorosis according to the Dean’s Index, specifically those categorized as Code 4 (moderate) and Code 5 (severe). Code 4 (Moderate): Characterized by extensive brown or yellow-brown staining with mild enamel wear. Code 5 (Severe): Characterized by deep stains, obvious pits, and increased enamel brittleness.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
9
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
19
Antibiotics exclusion Number of days without antibiotics usage (if applicable) and other antibiotics-related criteria used to exclude participants (if any)
6 months

Lab analysis

Sequencing type
16S
16S variable region One or more hypervariable region(s) of the bacterial 16S gene
V4
Sequencing platform Manufacturer and experimental platform used for quantifying microbial abundance
Illumina

Statistical Analysis

Data transformation Data transformation applied to microbial abundance measurements prior to differential abundance testing (if any).
relative abundances
Statistical test
LEfSe
Significance threshold p-value or FDR threshold used for differential abundance testing (if any)
0.05
MHT correction Have statistical tests be corrected for multiple hypothesis testing (MHT)?
No
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
3.0

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged
Faith Phylogenetic diversity, takes into account phylogenetic distance of all taxa identified in a sample
unchanged

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/13

Curator: LiliGC

Revision editor(s): LiliGC, KateRasheed

Source: Figure 3C, 4A

Description: Significantly different bacterial species between Healthy and M&S group based on LEfSe analysis.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in M&S (Moderate/Severe)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Bacillota
Fusobacterium nucleatum
Granulicatella elegans
Lactococcus lactis
Morococcus cerebrosus
Streptococcus mitis
Gemella parahaemolysans

Revision editor(s): LiliGC, KateRasheed

Signature 3

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/15

Curator: LiliGC

Revision editor(s): LiliGC, KateRasheed

Source: Figure 3C, 4A

Description: Significantly different bacterial species between Healthy and M&S group based on LEfSe analysis.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in M&S (Moderate/Severe)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Alloprevotella tannerae
Hoylesella shahii
Oribacterium parvum
Prevotella melaninogenica
Prevotella pallens
Schaalia odontolytica
Segatella salivae
Bacteroidota

Revision editor(s): LiliGC, KateRasheed

Experiment 2

Study 1205/Experiment 2

Experiment 3


Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/15

Curator: LiliGC

Revision editor(s): LiliGC, KateRasheed

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
This group includes participants diagnosed with dental fluorosis according to the Dean’s Index, specifically those categorized as Code 4 (moderate) and Code 5 (severe). Code 4 (Moderate): Characterized by extensive brown or yellow-brown staining with mild enamel wear. Code 5 (Severe): Characterized by deep stains, obvious pits, and increased enamel brittleness.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
14

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Statistical test
Mann-Whitney (Wilcoxon)
LDA Score above Threshold for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score for studies using the popular LEfSe tool
Not specified

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged
Faith Phylogenetic diversity, takes into account phylogenetic distance of all taxa identified in a sample
unchanged

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/20

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Fig. 4C, 4E, 4G

Description: Significantly different bacterial species between Healthy and M&S group based on Wilcoxon analysis.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in M&S (Moderate/Severe)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Streptococcus mitis
Gemella parahaemolysans
Lactococcus lactis

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/20

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Fig. 4D, 4F

Description: Significantly different bacterial species between Healthy and M&S group based on Wilcoxon analysis.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in M&S (Moderate/Severe)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Prevotella melaninogenica
Schaalia odontolytica

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Experiment 4


Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/20

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Differences from previous experiment shown

Subjects

Group 0 name Corresponds to the control (unexposed) group for case-control studies
Mild
Group 1 definition Diagnostic criteria applied to define the specific condition / phenotype represented in the case (exposed) group
This group includes participants diagnosed with dental fluorosis according to the Dean’s Index, specifically those categorized as Code 4 (moderate) and Code 5 (severe). Code 4 (Moderate): Characterized by extensive brown or yellow-brown staining with mild enamel wear. Code 5 (Severe): Characterized by deep stains, obvious pits, and increased enamel brittleness.
Group 0 sample size Number of subjects in the control (unexposed) group
19
Group 1 sample size Number of subjects in the case (exposed) group
14

Lab analysis

Statistical Analysis

Alpha Diversity

Shannon Estimator of species richness and species evenness: more weight on species richness
unchanged
Richness Number of species
unchanged
Faith Phylogenetic diversity, takes into account phylogenetic distance of all taxa identified in a sample
unchanged

Signature 1

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/20

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Fig. 4D

Description: Significantly different bacterial species between Mild and M&S group based on Wilcoxon analysis.

Abundance in Group 1: decreased abundance in M&S (Moderate/Severe)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Prevotella melaninogenica

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Signature 2

Needs review

Curated date: 2024/11/20

Curator: KateRasheed

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed

Source: Fig. 4C, 4E, 4G-H

Description: Significantly different bacterial species between Mild and M&S group based on Wilcoxon analysis.

Abundance in Group 1: increased abundance in M&S (Moderate/Severe)

NCBI Quality ControlLinks
Fusobacterium nucleatum
Gemella parahaemolysans
Lactococcus lactis
Streptococcus mitis

Revision editor(s): KateRasheed